Longer Anneal on Each Firing

 Need for an Extension of Anneal Soak on Subsequent Firings

 Sometimes people recommend extending the length of the anneal soak each time the piece is fired. If nothing significant is added, there is no reason to extend the anneal soak.  If the piece can be fired as fast as the previous firing, the annealing will be the same, not longer.

 The physics and chemistry of annealing glass are the same for re-fired glass - without additions - as they were for the first. Extending the annealing soak seems to be more about reassurance of the kilnformer than a necessity.

 Bullseye research has shown that it IS possible to over anneal, locking in stress. If concerned about inadequate annealing, it is best to reduce the cooling rate. Especially over the first 55°C below the anneal soak temperature.  The testing and recording that I have done for a book on tack fusing shows that any differences in the glass - at the end of the anneal soak - will be relieved in that first 55°C/100°F. The remainder of the cool to 370°C/700°F can be about 1.8 times faster, and the final cool ramp can be 3 times faster than the 2nd stage cool. 

 I have observed that a three stage anneal cool is important to successfully anneal a piece. This has been reinforced by the temperature recordings of many firings. Often at the end of the anneal soak there is a little more than the desired 5°C/10°F difference in temperature across the piece. The recordings show this is relieved during the slow firs stage cool and maintained over the next two cool stages. If the kiln is cooling more slowly than the schedule, no electricity is used.  No kiln time is lost.

An example of the first cooling stage

 The first stage cool is key to a successful stress-free result.  If there are concerns about inadequate annealing, two things are important.  Be sure the right length of soak is chosen for the piece being fired.  Second, reduce the speed of cooling by the rates for a piece at least 3mm thicker.  These rates are available from the Bullseye chart for annealing thick slabs.

 The rates are applicable to other than Bullseye glass.  Only the temperatures need to be changed.

 If no significant changes (other than powder, wafer or stringers) are made to the glass before the second firing, no lengthening of the annealing is necessary.

 More detailed information is available in the e-book: Low Temperature Kilnforming.

Re-firing

A frequently asked question is “how many times can I re-fire my piece?”

This is difficult to answer as it relates to the kind of glass and the firing conditions.

Kind of glass

Float glass is prone to devitrification. This often begins to appear on the second firing. Some times it may be possible to get a second firing without it showing. Sandblasting the surface after getting devitrification will enable another firing at least.

Art glass is so variable that each piece needs to be tested.

Fusing glasses are formulated for at least two firings, and experience shows may be fired many of times. The number will depend on the colours and whether they are opalescent. Transparent colours on the cool side of the spectrum seem to accept more firings than the hot colours. Both of these accept more firings than opalescent glasses do.

Firing conditions

Temperature

The higher the temperature pieces are fired at, the fewer re-firings are possible. So if multiple firings are planned, you should do each firing at the lowest possible temperature to get your result. This may mean that you have relatively long soaks for each firing. The final firing can be the one where the temperature is taken to the highest point.

Annealing

You do have to be careful about the annealing of pieces which have been fired multiple times. A number of people recommend longer annealing soaks. However, I find that the standard anneal soak for the thickness is enough. What is required is cooling rates directly related to the anneal soak.  This is a three-stage cooling as described in the Bullseye chart Annealing Thick Slabs.  The slump firing can be annealed at  the standard. 

Slumping

In general, slumping is at a low enough temperature to avoid any creation of additional stress through glass changes at its plastic temperatures.  But any time you heat the glass to a temperature above the annealing point, you must anneal again at least as slowly as in the previous firing. Any thing faster puts the piece at risk of inadequate annealing.  Of course, having put all this work and kiln time into the piece, the safest is to use the cooling rate as for a piece one layer thicker.  My research has shown that this gives the least evidence of stress.

Testing

Testing for stress after each firing will be necessary to determine if there is an increase in the stress within the piece. In the early stages of multiple firings, you can slow the annealing and if that shows reduced stress, it will determine your previous annealing schedule was inadequate. When reducing the rate of annealing does not reduce the stress, it is time to stop firing this piece at fusing temperatures.

Revised 6 May 2023

Texture Moulds

 Texture moulds are a form of bas relief in reverse. The texture of the mould is the bas relief. The glass formed over the shapes is in negative relief. The light is refracted through th
e back to give an image of bas relief although the surface is smooth.

 

Example of wave form texture mould

 These moulds are prone to produce bubbles at the generally recommended tack fuse temperatures. The glass often sticks to the mould if there is not sufficient draft to the parts of the image, or if insufficient separator is used. Often the moulds are produced with a rim around the edges, which trap the glass.

 The usual temperatures are too high. These moulds are an exercise in patience. The temptation is to fire higher than slumping temperatures to get good definition in the glass. However, a number of problems, especially bubbles, can be avoided by staying at the high end of slumping temperatures. This means the top temperature would be about 680C. To compensate for this low temperature, the soak needs to be three hours or more. To be sure the definition desired has been achieved, peeking near the end of this long soak is necessary. 

 Moulds that are produced with a rim around the edges can trap air and create bubbles. The rim forms a perimeter dam to confine the glass. If the rate of rise is quick to a high temperature, the edges can be sealed against the rim before all the air has escaped. It is advisable to cut the glass for these rimmed moulds a bit smaller than the internal dimensions formed by the rim.

 

Example of textured area surrounded by a rim

 Use of single layers on texture moulds can lead to large, thin bubbles. This is most prevalent when using high temperatures. Since the single layers tend to form more slowly than an already fused two-layer piece, the temptation is to use higher temperatures. The higher temperatures soften the glass to such an extent that often bubbles form over the lower areas of the mould. Instead, low temperatures with extremely long soaks should be used to allow the glass to conform to the undulations of the texture without dog boning or developing bubbles. Of course, peeking will be required to determine when the texture is achieved. With single layers, the surface will have greater undulations than with two layers. The thinness of the single layer cannot fill the depression the way two layers can.

 

 Rapid rates to high temperatures can produce internal bubbles too. These moulds have a multiplicity of hollows and depressions. Just as people are warned about depressions in their shelves, the depressions in the texture moulds can cause bubbles too. This means there are even more possibilities for bubble creation than on apparently flat shelves. Long slow bubble squeezes are required to allow air from under the glass.

 Glass sometimes sticks to the mould. This is most often blamed on insufficient separator. Boron nitride is a good separator for these moulds especially if you go to tack fusing temperatures. At slumping temperatures, kiln wash will normally be sufficient. Both of these separators need to be applied carefully, as there are relatively steep slopes throughout the mould. Spraying needs to be done from at least four angles to ensure all the sides are covered.

 Painting on kiln wash is a little more difficult, as the solution is so liquid, it tends to run down the slopes without much sticking. One means of rectifying this is to tip the mould in a circular motion to move the still liquid kiln wash solution around the slopes.

 Less often thought about is the draft of the shapes of the mould. If the slopes (draft) in the mould are too steep, the glass will “grab” the ceramic mould, because the ceramic contracts less than the glass when cooling. If shapes of the mould are steep and deep enough, the glass may even break as a result of this compression of the mould.

 

An example of some nearly vertical elements and a rim

 Of course, if a flat front surface is required, a higher than slumping temperature must be used. This is required to allow the glass to flow to the lower portions of the mould. It still should be as low as possible, but with very long soaks.

 Avoidance of bubbles on, and sticking to, texture moulds is best achieved by avoiding high temperatures, use long soaks, use two layers, and avoid extending glass to the rim. These combined with observation of the progress of the firing will produce the best results.

 

Other information is available:

Low Temperature Kilnforming, an Evidence-Based Approach to Scheduling, an ebook

Bas relief

Layups promoting bubbles

 

Slumping Breaks on “go-to” Schedules

Picture credit: Emma Lee 

 

An "It has always worked for me before" schedule implies a single approach to slumping regardless of differing conditions. 

In the example shown, we are not told the rate up to the slump.  But is clear the rate was too fast for the glass layup.  It cracked on the way up. This tells that the rate was only a little too fast.  If it had been faster the glass would have separated further apart.  The heat was enough to appear to recombine at the edges where it was not slumping so much. 

Review your "go to" schedules for each firing. It may still be a good base from which to work. But you need to assess the layup, thickness, and any other variations to help adjust the schedule to fire each piece. 

Some of the variations from the “standard” to be considered are: 

 Single layer slumping 

 Weight 

 Mould sizes 

 Relative Depth 

 Mould shape and detail

Drying Kiln Washed Moulds

A question about kiln wash. Do you have to let each coat dry while applying before applying the next coat?

 There seems to be a popular notion that newly kiln washed moulds must be cured before use.  I'm not sure where the information comes from, and no reasoning is given.  It is suggested that that quickly heating newly kiln washed moulds to 550°F (290°C) is important.

 If you want to make sure the mould is dry, this may not be the best way to do it.  All ceramics have a cristobalite inversion at around 225°C/437°F.  This a very rapid increase in volume of 2.5% that often leads to cracks and breaks in ceramics when the rate of advance is quick.  The mould will react better and last longer if the rate of advance is slow until that inversion temperature is passed.  But also note there is a quartz inversion at around 570°C/1060°F that is significant.

 

 This is another reason to advance the temperature slowly when slumping or draping with a ceramic mould.  A further reason to heat slowly is to avoid steam formation within the ceramic body.  If the steam is created over a short time, the force can be great enough to break the ceramic.  To ensure the water evaporates, a soak at 95°C/203°F for a significant amount of time is a better, safer option.

 But in addition to all these precautions, it simply is not necessary to cure kiln wash on slumping and draping moulds made of ceramics.  The glass does not begin to move until after 540°C/1000°F. Therefore, the kiln wash will be dry long before the glass gets near slumping temperatures.  Any vapor caused by evaporating water will escape through the vent holes in the mould or under the glass at the rim, as it will not form a seal until higher temperatures.

 

Newly kiln washed mould beside others already fired

 If you want to be sure your kiln wash is dry before you put the mould in the kiln, you can leave it in a warm ventilated space, or even on top of your kiln while it is being fired.  Using either drying method will dry the kiln wash sufficiently before the glass is placed on the slumping mould.

 The other part of the question was about drying the kiln wash between applying coats. It is not necessary to dry between coats of kiln wash.  In fact, a better result is obtained by applying all the coats at one time. It is not like painting wood. The result of applying all coats is a smoother surface.  There is no dragging of the dry powder along with the wet kiln wash as it is being applied over the existing coats.

 Kiln drying ceramic slumping and draping moulds is not necessary. It only adds another, unnecessary step in kilnforming preparations.  There are exceptionally good reasons to avoid rapid firing of damp moulds. 

 Some extra care could be taken with texture moulds and those intended for casting.

Sintering Ramps and Soaks

Sintering (or laminating) is a special form of low temperature kilnforming that requires attention to the ramp rates and the length of soaks. The rates and soak times were determined by the strength of the resulting pieces.

Credit: Researchgate.net

Rate

 The ramp rate has a significant effect on the strength of the resulting piece.

 A moderate rate (150°C/270°F) all the way to the sintering temperature of 690°C/1080°F gives the glass particles time to settle together. It works similarly to a slow ramp rate in slumping.

 A rapid rate (600°C/1275°F) - as used in medicine – to the sintering temperature of 690°C/1080°F is used for float glass particles.

 An alternative to both these is to schedule a rapid rise to the strain point followed by a slow - 50°C/90°F per hour - rate to the sinter temperature.

Soak

The soak time is extremely important in sintering to provide strong results. It is loosely related to the ramp rate, but in an inverse manner. The quicker the ramp, the longer the soak required.

 The moderate rate of 150°C/270°F needs a two-hour soak at the top temperature for maximum strength.

 The rapid rate of 600°C/1275°F requires about six hours of soaking at the top temperature.

 The alternative of a rapid rise to the strain point followed by the slow 50°C/90°F per hour rate requires at least a three-hour soak.

 These results show the ramp rate is important to the strength of the resulting piece. Fast ramp rates require increasingly long soaks at top temperature. Even slowing the ramp rate after reaching the strain point requires longer soaking than a steady rate. This is so even though the steady rate is faster than the two-part schedule to the top temperature.

 These results indicate that heat work is put into the glass throughout the temperature rise. The heat put slowly into the structure below the strain point still has an effect on the sintering of the glass.

 This is shown by the two-part schedule that has a slow ramp rate after the strain point. And even then, the time required is only 0.3hour shorter than for the moderate steady rise and soak. 

There is no time advantage to rapid rises to the strain point followed by a very slow rise to top temperature. The six-hour soak required by fast rises to top temperature show there is a large time disadvantage with rapid rise scheduling of sintering.

More information is available in the ebook Low Temperature Kilnforming and from Bullseye.

The Importance of Three-Stage Cooling

It is common to think of cooling after annealing as a simple single cool rate to an intermediate temperature between annealing and room temperatures before turning off. This most often works well for full fused pieces up to 6mm/0.25. But as the pieces become thicker or more complex, the need for more controlled cooling becomes necessary.

 The aim of annealing is to get the glass to be the same temperature throughout its substance during the annealing soak. This is called the ΔT (delta T).  This difference has been shown to be 5°C to avoid high levels of stress.  Therefore, ΔT=5°C/10°F.  This difference in temperature needs to be achieved during the annealing soak and maintained during the cool.

 The object of controlled cooling is to maintain this small difference in temperature. It needs to be maintained throughout the cool to avoid inducing excessive stress in the glass, even if the stress is only temporary.  

 As the thickness or complexity of the piece grows, the annealing soak needs to be longer and the cool slower. The first cool is critical to the production of stress-free fused glass. That is the fastest rate that can be used in a single or multiple stage cooling. If you use that rate all the way to 370°C/700°F you will need at least 1.3 times longer to get to that temperature than if you used the first two parts of a 3-stage cool. This time saving becomes greater as complexity and thickness demand slower cool rates. It is not only time that is saved.

 The risk of breaks from rapid cooling after the anneal soak and to 370°C/700°F increases with more complex and thicker pieces. Although the stress induced by rapid cooing below the strain point is temporary, it can be great enough momentarily to break the glass. This is so even if the glass meets the ΔT=5°C/10° during the annealing soak.

  

Examples may help understand the cooling requirements of glass that it thicker, or tack or contour fused.

Example 1

A 12mm/0.5” full fused piece needs a two-hour annealing soak, followed by three cooling rates of 55°C/100°F per hour, 99°C/180°F hour and finally 300°C/540°F per hour. The first rate is for the first 55°C/100°F, the second rate for the next 55°C/100°F, and the final rate is to room temperature.

 What happens here is instructive as to the reasons for soaks and cool rates. In this recorded example the ΔT at the start of the anneal is 7°C/12.6°F. During the soak, the ΔT reduces to as little as 2°C, but ends with a ΔT=3°C. The 55°C/100°F cool rate over the first 55°C/100°F enables the ΔT to remain between 3°C and 4°C.  The second cool over the next 55°C/100°F maintains this ΔT of 3°C to 4°C. During the final cool the ΔT varies from 5°C to 1°C.

 

An example of the variation in ΔT during the first 55C/100F of cooling

Example 2

A rounded tack fuse of 1-base and 2-layer stacks gives a total of 9mm/0.375”. Research has shown that you need to schedule for twice the actual thickness for rounded tack fusing - so for 19mm/0.75”.

This requires an anneal soak of 150 minutes, and a first cool of 20°C/36°F. The second cool rate can be increased to 36°C/65°F. The final rate can be at 120°C/216°F per hour to room temperature.

 The ΔT at the beginning of annealing was 7°C/12.6°F and at the end of a 2-hour soak was a ΔT of 1°C/2°F. The first cool ramp was 20°C/36°F per hour and gave a variance of between 2°C/3.6° and 0°. The final cool produced variances of up to 6°C/11°F, ending at 88°C/190°F with a ΔT=2°C.

 The first two stages of cooling save 1.27 hours of cooling time over a single stage cooling of 20°C/36°F to 371°C/700°F. It still keeps the glass within that ΔT=5°C. More importantly, the third stage cooling is able to keep the variance to between 6°C and down to 2°C.

 The natural (unpowered) cooling rate of my 50cm/19.5” kiln at 370°C/700°F is 240°C/432°F per hour. It settles to the 120°C/216°F per hour only at 200°C/392°F. This is a fairly typical cooling rate for medium sized kilns. This rapid cooling at 370°C/700°F creates a greater risk of breakage than the controlled cool.

 

An example of the ΔT during the second 55C/100F of cooling

Example 3

A sharp tack or sintered piece with two base layers and two tack layer stacks on top requires firing as though 30mm/1.18”.

 This needs a 4-hour soak during which the ΔT varied from 8°C to 4°C. The first cooling rate was at 7°C/12.6°F and gave a ΔT variance of 4°C to 2°C. The second cooling rate of 12°C/22°F produced variances of 3°C to 1°C by 370°C/700°F. The final cool of 40°C/72°F per hour gave differences ranging from 5°C to 0° at 110°C/230°F.

 Note that the test kiln’s natural cooling rate does not achieve the third cooling rate until 140°C/284°F.  This shows that turning off the kiln at 370°C/700°F produces a high risk of breakage for thick and complicated pieces.  In addition, the two stage cooling rates saves 3.27 hours of cooling time.

An example of the ΔT during the final stage of cooling to Room Temperature

 The temperature differentials below the strain point can exceed the ΔT=5. The stresses induced are temporary according to scientists. But they can be great enough to break the glass during the cooling. It follows that the anneal soak may have been adequate, but the cool was so fast that excess stress was induced by the differential contraction rates. This stress being temporary, implies that testing for stress in a broken piece may not show any. The momentary excess stress will have been relieved upon cooling completely to room temperature.  (IMI-NFG Course on Processing in Glass, by Mathieu Hubert, PhD. 2015 , p.9.)

 

More information on cooling is given in the book LowTemperature Kilnforming; an Evidence-Based Approach to Scheduling.

Frit Additions to Shaped Pieces

It is possible to stick frit to slumped pieces. But soaking for a long time – several hours - at 650°C/1200°F is required to stick the frit.  The added pieces will remain relatively sharp. You need to observe frequently from 600°C/1111°F to make sure that the form of the glass is not distorting. 

Credit: Pyramid Gallery, Smyth and Zebrak

Although it is possible, adding pieces to already shaped objects is not best practice, nor will it frequently give satisfactory results.  If the slump is shallow, it is more possible to do this successfully than steep or highly shaped forms.  But the most suitable practice is to flatten the piece, then tack fuse the pieces onto it. Follow this fusing with the new slump or drape.  This flattening process will not be possible with all shapes. 

The best results will be achieved by accepting what you have and make a new piece with the planned additions from the start.

This process will not be suitable for draped glass as the glass will drape further during this low temperature soak.

 

I've a book that gives more detail. Low Temperature Kilnforming, an evidence based approach to scheduling  or at Bullseye

Kiln Choices

There are a lot of considerations when you are preparing to buy a kiln. Often the advice to people buying a new kiln is to “buy the largest you can afford,” or “x kiln is great, and they have good service.”  These are general advice, not directly applicable to your needs.

More important is to think about buying a kiln that suits your kind of work. This might be:

• Flat and shallow sumps
• Small and detailed work
• Powder and other work that needs detailed assembly and little movement
• Deep slumps/ tall drapes
• Drop-outs and melts
• Large scale panels

These kinds of work are determinants for the size and depth of kiln you require. Even if you were to later decide on a larger kiln, the first kiln will continue to be valuable. And having a choice of kilns means you can use the one most suitable to the work.

The way you assemble your work will affect your choice of how the kiln opens. The most common styles are:

• Front door     
• Top lid    
• Clamshell/Top hat

Each has its advantages for different types of work.

Kiln depths are variable. Shallow kilns are easier to load. Deep kilns give more possibilities for casting and drops. It is possible to raise shelves on posts in deep kilns for flat work, making deep kilns flexible for both kinds of work.

The scale of your work will have a big effect on the kiln size. The larger the scale the bigger the kiln will be needed. But be careful to avoid “buying the largest you can afford” attitude. Kiln sizes vary:

• Tiny
• Small            
• medium  
• large
• extra large

 These are some of the considerations that have been organised into two grids. They are an attempt to organise by the kind of work you intend to do with this kiln - drops, casting, jewellery, etc. It then lists the choice by kiln characteristics such as size, opening method, insulation, etc. Some of these characteristics will not be relevant to you at this time, but may be later.

A range of kilnforming styles are given across the top and kiln characteristics down the side of the grid. Where the kiln is very good for the kind of work given at the head of the column a “Y” is entered.  Where the kiln is definitely not suitable a “N” is given. Where neither of these are given, the kiln will do the work acceptably, but not in an optimum manner.

 

 

This second grid relates to controls and various features that kilns have added to the basic kiln. It provides you with a checklist of items that might be desirable and allows you to compare different brands of the same shape according to the additional features they have or can have added.

Circles – Some Methods of Scoring and Breaking Out

 Scoring the circle

Setting out the centre point and radius of the circle

Set up a centre point. You can do it by estimating. But it is more accurate to measure a centre point that is at least 1cm from the edges. Use that crossing point to measure out the radius of the circle.

 

Setting out the circle measurements

Place the pivot point of the circle cutter on the cross hairs. Lock it into place.

 

Locking the pivot into place on the cross hairs

Adjust the cutting wheel along the length of the circle cutter bar to the marked radius. The measure marks on the bar are not always accurate and anyway wear away quickly.

 

Adjusting the scoring wheel to the correct length

 

Tightening the set screw at the top of the turret

Tighten the set screw.

 

Add a touch of oil to show the score line. Make a test circle by pushing the bar around with no pressure. This shows up any obstructions around the end of the bar. 

Preparing to test the sweep of the cutter arm

Score in an anti-clockwise direction. This avoids accidental loosening of the set screw if it is under the button or handle. 

 

Start with the scoring head under the arm with which you are securing the centre pivot. This allows you to do the whole score in one motion. The pressure you use should be no more than in your normal scoring.

 

Oil trace of the score can be seen in the upper left quadrant

 

Running the score 

Running the score is a glazier’s term to indicate the way in which a scored line gradually separates under gently applied breaking pressure. This can be seen when gently applying pressure with cut running pliers. The score line is made progressively visible by the gradual separation of the glass. This results from the light passing through in a different way than when it is not separated from top to bottom.

 

The glazier’s method to get a clean break of a circle is to score on one side with a trace of oil. Then turn the glass over and press with your thumbs on the score line. Running the score from the back requires a little skill and a certain amount of courage or determination.

The object is to bend the glass just enough to crack it along the score without breaking it anywhere else. The best surface is a short pile carpet square, a rubber mat or a single layer of towel or an unfolded newspaper. These provide a surface with a little “give” to allow the glass to deform.

But if you have too soft a surface, it is easy to break through the circle. A too soft surface is given by a household carpet, several layers of towel, or any other surface with a lot of “give” to it.

You may need both thumbs to start the run depending on the pressure you can exert. Try one thumb first. If that is not enough use both thumbs.

 

At the start of the second pressure point

If you place your thumb opposite a corner, you have greater leverage to start the run of the score. This leverage makes the running of the score easier as less pressure is required. You will hear a loud click at the opening of the first part of the score. 

Score has been run completely around the circle

Continue around the circle by pressing at the end of the opened score, until the whole score has been run. You may hear quiet clicks as the score opens. Other times there will be no sound, but you will see the score run away from the pressure point.

Once you have run the score from the back, turn the glass over to have the scored surface up. This makes it ready for the relief scores. It is much more successful if all the scores – circle and relief - are made from the same side. Unless you are scoring float or other glass that is smooth on both sides, this flipping back will be the easiest anyway.

 

Make the relief scores on the front.. Sometimes only one relief score is required to release the circle from the surrounding glass.

 

Another method is to cut the corners off so that you have an octagon around the circle. This gives you the opportunity to run the score from the top with breaking pliers. Ease the score open progressively around the circle.

Opening the score with pliers

This method is easiest for opalescent glass where you cannot see through to the score. By opening the score from the top, you do not have to estimate where the score line is. You can see the oil trace indicating where the score is and where to place your breaking pliers. 

You should start at a place where there is only a centimetre or two between the edge of the glass and the score. This may mean that you have to move around the broader areas of the rim so that the score runs both back to the first opened score and forward. It is in effect, opening a new score four times. But with gentle persuasion the scores will run toward one another. Do not use heavy pressure in griping the pliers, or in bending the glass. Gradually increase the bending pressure until you hear the click of the glass separating.

These two methods of running the score give the cleanest break-out of circles.

  

Relief scores

There are multiple ways to create the relief scores.

Perpendicular

Score by drawing the cutter from the circle out to the narrow edge, leaving a small gap between the opened score of the circle and the start of the score.

 

You can also score a longer line to the corner. Again, leave a space between the circle and start of the relief score.

 

Tangents

 A third way is to score tangents from the edge to the opened score of the circle. 

Tangent scored from both sides of the circle

Tangent broken from both sides of the circle

Alternatively, score a first tangent and run the score

Further tangents scored and broken away

All the tangents run and broken away 

This reduces the risk of breaking through the centre of the circle. But it does leave little nubs of glass at the point of each tangential score. And for that reason alone, is the least satisfactory of the methods of breaking out circles.    

In each of these methods of running a relief score, you need to tap under the relief score to run it to the edge of the circle. Normally, the quarters or other fractions will drop out one by one. Occasionally the rim will drop away after the scores of the first two quarters are run.

 

Breaking out without running circle first

There are at least two ways to cut a circle without running the circle score first.

The first is to cut the corners off the glass to create an octagon, but do not run the score.

First corner scored and removed

 

The four corners removed

Starting to run the circle with breaking pliers

Then use breaking pliers to run the scored circle. Once the score is run, make a single or multiple relief scores, and carefully run it. the circle can then be removed from the octagonal rim. This provides a clean cut.

 

corners and rim removed 

It does not risk breaking through the scored circle to the interior when tapping the relief score.

Many people run scores at a tangent to the circle without having opened the score of the circle. These are then run, in turn, to and along the edge of the scored circle.

They can then be broken off in turn, if they don’t simply fall off when they all are run.

 

tangent removal 

Finally, some people tap under the scored circle to run the score, as in the first of the tangent removal methods. This leaves shells – or ledges – on the glass circle. These must be removed by grozing or grinding. Grinding leaves a rough surface which takes copper foil tape less well than clean cuts. It also increases the possibility of devitrification when fusing.

Tapping leads to shells as in the centre left of this picture

The least satisfactory method of running the score of a circle is to tap under the score before breaking the circle out.

 

In conclusion, running the scored circle first and without tapping will provide you with the cleanest cut circle. This will be so however your make your relief scores. But, making relief scores before running the circle score risks breaking through the circle.

Finally, it should be noted that cutting out larger circles is easier than cutting small ones. Better, cleaner results are obtained because the curves are less tight.