Annealing Strategies

This is a power point presentation I gave a few weeks ago to a group.  It may be of interest to others.  There is no commentary.

 

Reducing Annealing Time for Float Glass

Credit: Bullseye Glass Co.

Annealing float glass seems take a long time. The annealing point (Tg) is higher than most fusing glasses, although float glass is part of the family of soda lime glass. This group of glasses should be cooled slowly from annealing temperature to 427ºC/800ºF and below to reduce risks of thermal shock.  This makes a greater temperature range over which to  anneal float than fusing glasses, consequently it extends the cooling time and increases energy expenses.

It does not have to be this way.  Annealing of glass takes place over a range.  This range extends below the published annealing point (Tg).  This is the temperature at which equalisation can most quickly take place, but it is not as energy efficient as starting in the lower range.  Annealing points (Tg) vary between manufacturers, but these are some of them:

Pilkington Optiwhite              559ºC/1039ºF

Pilkington Optifloat               548ºC/1019ºF

USA float (typical)                548ºC/1019ºF

Australian float (average)      550ºC/1022ºF

The annealing range extends to a practical 38ºC/68ºF below the Tg temperature.  Annealing at a lower temperature can be as effective at the lower portion of the range as at the Tg.  Using a lower annealing soak temperature reduces the temperature range of the first cooling stage by as much as 38ºC/68ºF, and reduces the cooling time without increasing risks of breaking.  It also creates a denser glass according to scientific research.  Denser glass is arguably a stronger glass.

This means that the annealing of float glass can take place at the following reduced temperatures:

Pilkington Optiwhite              521ºC/971ºF

Pilkington Optifloat               510ºC/900ºF

USA float (typical)                510ºC/900ºF

Australian float (average)      512ºC/954ºF

 

This reduces the first cooling stage for 12mm/0.5” Pilkington Optiwhite from 2 hours 24 minutes to 1 hour 43 minutes.  Forty-one minutes may not seem much but in electricity costs is significant.  Also using the Bullseye concept of a three stage cooling, further savings can be made.  Their research shows the second cooling stage to 371ºC/700ºF can be increased by 1.8 times the first cooling rate, saving further time and energy.  The chart which shows these rates is Annealing Thick Slabs -  Celsius and - Fahrenheit.

More information on annealing is available in the ebook Annealing: Concepts, Principles and Practice

Annealing float glass at the lower part of the annealing range reduces the time and cost of firings.

Scheduling for Thick Landscapes

Thick slabs often involve numerous firings of increasingly thick work.  I am using an existing example, with their permission, of the first stages of a thick landscape.  The initial concern was with bubbles in the first layup, then the strategy for firing the thick slab.

Plans

This is the first part of a landscape with depth.  It will be fired 5-7 more times.  This first piece will be inverted for the next firing with the clear facing up, to avoid reactions between the colours.  It is similar to an open face casting. There is a Bullseye Tip Sheet on open face casting that will give a lot of information.

Layup

Picture credit: Osnat Menshes

This work has a base of clear that is mostly overlaid with one layer of 3mm pieces, although in some places another layer, and there are some pre-fired elements as well.  It is fired on Thinfire shelf paper.

Bubbles 

There is concern about the number and size of the bubbles after the firing, and how to avoid them.  Will they grow over the multiple firings?

The many small bubbles are characteristic of kilnformed glass.  The few larger bubbles may result from the frit that is under the pieces that form the top surface.  And there are some overlaps of clear over colour that may form pockets where air can collect. I advise leaving the scattering of the frit until all the decorative pieces are in place.  The bubbles will migrate toward the top during the multiple firings.  They will not grow in size unless they combine during the upward migration.  A later suggestion about reducing the number of firings will reduce the bubble migration and risk of increasing in size.

Picture credit: Osnat Menshes

Schedule

Proposed Schedule (Temperatures in degrees Celsius)

1: 180 – 560, 30’    I would go to 610 for 30'

2: 25 – 680, 120’    I would use only 30'

3: 220 – 810, 15’    I would set the top temperature at 816, 15’.

4: 9999 – 593, 30’  Eliminate this segment. 

5: 9999 – 482, 120’ I suggest one hour soak

8: 55 – 370, off      83 – 427, 0’

7: 150 – 371, 0’

8: 330 – to room temperature, off.

 

Eliminate segment number 4.  Any temperature equalisation done at this temperature, is undone by the AFAP to the  annealing.  The temperature equalisation occurs at the annealing temperature. No soak at an intermediate temperature is required.  This blog post gives some information about annealing above and below the annealing point (Tg). 

Firing Incremental Layers

The plan is for five to seven more firings.  Continuing to build up the thickness on each firing, may have some problems.

• There is increased risk of compatibility problems when firing a piece to full fuse many times.
• There is a risk of more bubbles and of the existing ones becoming larger as they move upwards and combine with other smaller ones.
• With each firing the thickness is increasing and so becoming a longer firing.  This is because the heat up, annealing, and cooling each need to be longer.  For example - 6mm needs 3hour cooling, 12mm needs 5 hours, 19mm needs 9 hours. 

Multiple Slabs

These are the main reasons that I recommend firing a series of 6mm slabs separately and combining them in one final firing.  Firing a series of 6mm slabs and then combining them in a single long and slow final firing has advantages.

• The individual pieces do not need to go through so many full fuse firings, reducing the risk of compatibility problems.
• The small bubbles in each firing will not have the chance to rise through all the layers to become larger.
• The total time in the kiln for the combined pieces will be less than adding layers to already fired layers.

Examples

It is often difficult to convince people that firing by adding incrementally to an existing slab, longer firing times are required than by firing a group of 6mm slabs and a single combined firing of all the slabs.  I give an example to illustrate the differences.

Annealing

Assume there are to be a total of eight firings (existing 6mm slab and 3mm for each of seven more firings).  Also assume that each additional firing is of 3mm. This makes a total of 28mm.  Compare annealing and cooling times for each firing:

Firing      thickness       anneal and cool (hours minimum)

1            6mm                    3

2            9mm                    4

3            12mm                   5

4            15mm                   7

5            18mm                   9

6            21mm                   11.5

7            25mm                   14

8            28mm                   17

Total                                   70.5 hours annealing time (minimum)

To fire up 5 six millimetre slabs takes less time – 3 hours annealing and cooling time for each firing cumulates to 15 hours.  Add to that the final firing of 17 hours annealing time.  A total of 32 hours.  This is half the time of adding to the existing slab at each firing.  Multiple 6mm slabs can be fired at the one time if there is space in the kiln, which would reduce the kiln time for the 6mm slabs even further. 

An additional advantage of firing 6mm slabs and combining them, is that bubbles can be squeezed out more easily in the final thick slab fring because of the combined weight of the  slabs.  You could make the individual slabs a little thicker, but that would involve damming each slab.  Not an impossible task of course.  And it would change the calculations, by reducing the number of firings.

Heat Up

Another time saving is to use the second cooling rate from the Bullseye document Annealing Thick Slabs as the first up ramp rate. Take this rate up to a minimum of 540˚C. Although, this is an arbitrary temperature above the strain point to ensure all the glass is above the brittle phase.  It is possible to maintain this initial rate to the bubble squeeze.  But with the slow rises in temperature required for thicker slabs, it is sensible to increase the rate from 540 to bubble squeeze to reduce the firing time.  Once past the bubble squeeze a more rapid rate can be used to the top temperature.  

The heat up times could be about half the minimum cooling times.

A worked example (with certain assumptions) would be:

Firing      thickness       time to top temperature total time.

1            6mm             6.3               

2            9mm             7.1

3            12mm            8.4

4            15mm            10.7

5            18mm            15.9

6            21mm            19.4

7            25mm            25.1

8            28mm            29.1              ca.122 hours

But firing five times for 6mm equals 31.5 hours plus the final firing up of 29.1 hours equals a total of 60.6 hours.  Again about one half the time of progressively building up a base slab to the final thickness.

Savings

This example shows that approximately 90 hours of firing time can be saved by making a series of six millimetre slabs and combining them in a final firing.  There is the additional advantage of reducing the occurrence of bubbles between the layers in the final firing because of the weight of the combined slabs.

Slumping and Annealing bottles

"Can a tack fuse schedule for fusing glass can be used to slump bottles?"

It may be that this person does not have the confidence to write a new schedule.  They may wish to use an existing schedule for another purpose. The short answer is “Although a Bullseye or Oceanside tack fuse temperature will be high enough to slump bottles, they are not suitable for annealing”.  There are reasons for this. 

The softening point of float glass, which is similar to bottle glass, is 720ºC/1330ºF.  Slumping would normally be done at about 20ºC/36ºF above this. You also need a slumping hold at this temperature much longer than a tack fuse schedule would use.

if you use a tack fuse schedule for a fusing glass, your annealing will be inadequate. Bottle and float glass tend to have an annealing point of around 540ºC/1005ºF. An annealing for fusing glass will be between 515ºC/960ºF and 482ºC/900ºF.  This is likely to be too low an annealing point for bottles.  Also, the annealing soak is likely to be too short. Slumped bottles are very thick at the base where it folds over the cylinder of the bottle.  This requires a longer anneal soak and slower cool than a schedule for a tack fuse of fusing glass.

Checking for stress in the completed work is normal.  It is essential for your finished bottle if you use a tack fuse to fire it.

 

Schedules should be devised for the glass and layup of each piece. Transferring a schedule for fusing to bottle glass is unlikely to be successful.

Heat Up vs Annealing

I am amazed by the effort put into ramp up rates, bubble squeezes, and top temperatures in comparison to annealing.  The emphasis on social media groups seems to be to get the right ramp rates for tack fuses and slumps, bubble squeezes, etc.  Most of the attention is on the way up to processing temperature.

The treatment of annealing and cooling is almost cavalier by comparison.  The attention seems to be on what temperature, and how long a soak is needed.  Then some arbitrary rate is used to cool to 370ºC/700ºF.

Annealing, in comparison to firing to top temperature, is both more complex and more vital to getting sound, lasting projects completed.  Skimping on annealing is an unsound practice leading to a lot of post-firing difficulties.

Annealing is more than a temperature and a time.  It is also the cooling to avoid inducing temporary stress. That stress during cooling can be large enough to break the glass.  This temporary stress is due to expansion differentials within the glass.

People often cite the saving of electricity as the reason for turning off at 370ºC/700ºF.  My response is that if the kiln is cooling off slower than the rate set, there will be no electricity used.  No electricity demands.  No controller intervention.  No relay operation.

Annealing at the lower end of the range with a three-stage cooling provides good results.  The results of Bullseye research on annealing are shown in their chart for annealing thick items.  It applies to glass 6mm and much larger.  It results from a recommendation to anneal at the lower end of the annealing range to get good anneals.  Other industrial research shows annealing in the lower end gives denser glass, and by implication, more robust glass.  Wissmach have accepted the results of Bullseye research and now recommend 482ºC/900ºF as the annealing temperature for their W96.  The annealing point of course remains at 516ºC/960ºF.

Bullseye research goes on to show that a progressive cooling gives the best results.  They recommend a three-stage cooling process.  The first is for the initial 55ºC/º100F below the annealing temperature, a second 55ºC/100ºF cooling and a final cooling to room temperature.

It is a good practice to schedule all three cooling rates.  It may be considered unnecessary because your kiln cools slower than the chart indicates.  Well, that is fine until you get into tack and contour fusing.  Then you will need the three-stage cooling process as you will be annealing for thicknesses up to 2.5 times actual height.

 

Of course, you can find out all the reasons for careful annealing in my book "Annealing; concepts, principles, practice" Available from Bullseye at

https://classes.bullseyeglass.com/ebooks/ebook-annealing-concepts-principles-practice.html

Or on Etsy in the VerrierStudio shop

https://www.etsy.com/uk/listing/1290856355/annealing-concepts-principles-practice?click_key=d86e32604406a8450fd73c6aabb4af58385cd9bc%3A1290856355&click_sum=9a81876e&ref=shop_home_active_4

Scheduling with the Bullseye Annealing Chart

This post is about adapting the Bullseye chart Annealing Thick Slabs to write a schedule for any soda lime glass as used in kilnforming.

I frequently recommend that people should use the Bullseye chart for Annealing Thick Slabs in Celsius  and Fahrenheit.  This chart applies to glass from 6mm to 200mm (0.25” to 8”).

“Why should the Bullseye annealing chart be used instead of some other source?  I don’t use Bullseye.”

My answer is that the information in the chart is the most thoroughly researched set of tables for fusing compatible glass that is currently available.  This means that the soak times and rates for the thicknesses can be relied upon.

“How can it be used for glass other than Bullseye?”  

The rates and times given in the chart work for any soda lime glass, even float. It is only some of the temperatures that need to be changed.

"How do I do that?"  

My usual response is: substitute the annealing temperature for your glass into the one given in the Bullseye table.

 "It’s only half a schedule."

That is so.  The heating of glass is so dependent on layup, size, style, process, and purpose of the piece.  This makes it exceedingly difficult to suggest a generally applicable firing schedule.  People find this out after using already set schedules for a while. What works for one layup does not for another.

Devising a Schedule for the Heat Up

There is no recommendation from the chart on heat up.  You have to write your own schedule for the first ramps.  I can give some general advice on some of the things you need to be aware of while composing your schedule.

The essential element to note is that the Bullseye chart is based on evenly thick pieces of glass.  Tack fusing different thicknesses of glass across the piece, requires more caution. The practical process is to fire as for thicker pieces.  The amount of additional thickness is determined by the profile being used.  The calculation for addition depends on the final profile.  The calculation for thickness is as follows:

• Contour fusing - multiply the thickest part by 1.5. 
• Tack fusing - multiply the thickest part by 2. 
• Sharp tack or sinter - multiply the thickest part by 2.5.

The end cooling rate for the appropriate thickness is a guide for the first ramp rate of your schedule.  For example, the final rate for an evenly thick piece 19mm/0.75” is 150ºC/270ºF.  This could be used as the rate for the first ramp. 

Bob Leatherbarrow has noted that most breaks occur below 260ºC/500ºF.  If there are multiple concerns, more caution can be used for the starting ramp rate.  My testing shows that using a rate of two thirds the final rate of cooling with a 20 minute soak is cautious.  In this example of a 19mm piece it would be 100ºC/180ºF per hour.

Even though for thinner pieces the rates given are much faster, be careful.  It is not advisable to raise the temperature faster than 330ºC/600ºF per hour to care for both the glass and the kiln shelf.

Once the soak at 260ºC//500ºF is finished, the ramp to the bubble squeeze should maintain the previous rate.  It should not be speeded up.  The glass is still in the brittle phase.

After the bubble squeeze you can use a ramp rate to the top temperature of up to 330C/600F.   AFAP rates to top temperature are not advisable.  It is difficult to maintain control of the overshoots in temperature that are created by rapid rates.  

The top temperature should be such as to achieve the result in 10 minutes to avoid problems that can occur with extended soaks at top temperature.

In the example of an evenly thick 19mm/0.75” piece a heat up full fuse schedule like this could be used:

• 150ºC/270ºF to 566ºC/1052ºF for 0 minutes
• 50C/90F to 643C/1191F for 30 minutes
• 333ºC/600ºF to 804ºC/1479ºF for 10 minutes

 

If a more cautious approach to the heat up is desired, this might be the kind of schedule used:

 

• 100ºC/180ºF to 260ºC/500ºF for 20 minutes
• 100ºC/180ºF to 566ºC/1052ºF for 0 minutes
• 50C/90F to 643ºC/1191ºF for 30 minutes
• 333ºC/600ºF to 804ºC/1479ºF for 10 minutes

This approach is applicable to all fusing glasses.

 

Adapting the Bullseye Annealing Chart

After writing the first part of the schedule, you can continue to apply the annealing information from the Bullseye chart.  The first part of the anneal cooling starts with dropping the temperature as fast as possible to the annealing temperature.

The method for making the chart applicable to the annealing is a matter of substitution of the temperature.  All the other temperatures and rates apply to all fusing glasses.

Use the annealing temperature from your source as the target annealing  temperature in place of the Bullseye one.  The annealing soak times are important to equalise the temperature within the glass to an acceptable level (ΔT=5ºC).  The annealing soak time is related to the calculated thickness of the piece.  This measurement is done in the same way as devising the appropriate rate for heat up. 

Applying the Cooing Rates

Then apply the rates and temperatures as given in the chart.  The three stage cooling is important.  The gradually increasing rates keep the temperature differentials within acceptable bounds with the most rapid and safe rates.

The temperatures and rates remain the same for all soda lime glasses – the range of glass currently used in fusing, including float glass.  The soak time for the calculated thickness of your glass piece will be the same as in the Bullseye chart.  

This means that the first cooling stage will be to 427ºC/800ºF.  The second stage will be from 427ºC/800ºF to 371ºC/700˚F.  And the final stage will be from 371ºC/700˚F to room temperature.

I will repeat, because it is so important, that the thickness to be used for the anneal soak and cooling rates for your schedule relates to the profile you desire.  A fuse with even thickness across the whole piece can use the times, temperatures, and rates as given in the chart as adapted for your glass.  The thicknesses to use are for:

Contour fusing - multiply the thickest part by 1.5. 

Tack fusing - multiply the thickest part by 2. 

Sharp tack or sinter - multiply the thickest part by 2.5.

An annealing cool schedule for 19mm/0.75" Oceanside glass is like this:

• AFAP to 510˚C/ 951˚F for 3:00 hours
• 25˚C/45˚F to 427˚C/800˚F for 0 time
• 45˚C/81˚F to 371˚C/700˚F for 0 time
• 150˚C/270˚F to room temperature, off.

Many will wish to turn off the kiln as early as possible.  This is not part of best kilnforming practice.  If you still wish to do this, the turn off temperature must be related to the thickness and nature of the piece.  To turn off safely, you need to know the cooling characteristics of your kiln.  This can be determined by observing the temperature against time and then calculating the kiln’s natural cooling rate. And then applying that information to cooling the kiln.

 

The best source for devising schedules is the Bullseye chart for Annealing Thick Slabs.  It is well researched and is applicable with little work to develop appropriate schedules for all the fusing glasses currently in use.

 

 

Scientific Notes on Annealing

 The course from which this information is taken is based on float glass.  This is a soda lime glass just as fusing glass is.  The general observations – although not the temperatures – can be applied to fusing glasses.  This is a paraphrase of the course. It relates these observations to kilnforming.  The course is IMI-NFG Course on Processing in Glass, by Mathieu Hubert, PhD. 2015 

 

Viscosity vs. Temperature for a borosilicate glass
Graph credit: Schott

Viscosity Influence on Annealing

 Viscosity increases with reduction in temperature.  So high viscosity (low temps) cannot release stress; low viscosity (high temperature) cannot maintain shape – it will deform.  The range of viscosity is small.  The viscosity must not be so high that the stress cannot be relieved, nor must it be so low that the glass is unable to retain its shape. (p.6).  This indicates there is an inverse relationship between temperature and viscosity.  This is something we experience each time we fire. 

 The mathematical definition for strain point - high viscosity - is 10^14.5 Poise.   And the annealing point as 10^13.4 Poise, where if the glass is all the same temperature, the stress can be relieved in about 15 minutes.  (p.7-8)  

 As kilnformers we talk of the annealing range in terms of temperature, because that is what we can measure. The annealing occurs within a small range of viscosity. This has a relation to temperature that is not the same for all glass compositions. 

 The definition of the annealing as the range of viscosity at which annealing can occur is important.  

 First, the viscosity value remains the same over many types and styles of glass.  The temperature required to achieve that viscosity varies, leading to different annealing temperatures for different glass. 

 Second, there is a range of viscosity - and therefore temperature - during which annealing can occur.  The annealing point is 10^13.4 Poise, at which viscosity the stresses in glass can most quickly be relieved (generally within 15 minutes for 3mm glass).  However, the stress can be relieved at greater viscosities up to almost the strain point - 10^14.5 Poise. (p.8).  At higher temperatures, the glass becomes more flexible and cannot relieve stress.  At lower temperatures (beyond a certain point) it becomes so stiff that stress cannot be relieved.  Again, those temperatures are determined by the viscosity of the glass.

 

Annealing Soaks

 Annealing can take place at different points within the range.  Bullseye chose some years ago to recommend annealing at a higher viscosity, i.e., a lower temperature.  This has also been applied by Wissmach in their documentation although initially the published annealing point was almost 30°C higher. 

 The closer to the strain point that annealing is conducted, the longer it will take to relieve the stress.  Annealing at the strain point is possible, but it is impractical.  Apparently, it would take at least 15 hours for a 6mm thick piece (p.8). 

 However, the trade off in annealing a few degrees above the strain point – requiring longer annealing soaks – is reducing the amount of time required by the annealing cool, especially for thicker or more difficult items.

 A further advantage to annealing at lower temperatures and slower rates is that it results in a denser glass – one with lower volume (p.3). Arguably, a denser glass is a stronger one.

 

Annealing Cool

 After annealing, the glass should be cooled slowly and uniformly to avoid formation of internal stresses due to temperature differentials within the glass.  Stresses that are unrelieved above the strain point are permanent.  Stresses induced during cooling below the strain point are temporary, unless they are too great.  To avoid permanent stress, the cooling should be slow between anneal soak and strain point (p.9).  Although glass can be cooled more quickly below the strain point, care must be taken that the temperature differentials within the glass are not so great as to cause breaks due to uneven contraction.

 Annealing cool factors for flat pieces are about three times that for cylinders and five times that for spheres (p.26). Or the other way around – spheres can be annealed in one fifth the time, and cylinders in one third of the time as flat glass of the same volume.   This indicates how much more difficult it is to anneal in kilnforming than in glass blowing.

 The industrial cooling rate for float glass of 4mm is 6 times the rate for 10mm although only 2.5 times the difference in thickness (p.27). This indicates that the thicker the glass, the slower the rate of cooling should be.  But also, that there is not a linear correlation between cooling rate and thickness.

 Glass with no stress has a uniform refractive index.  Stresses produce differences in the refractive index which are shown up by the use of polarised light filters.

Source: IMI-NFG Course on Processing in Glass, by Mathieu Hubert, PhD. 2015 (available online www.lehigh.edu/imi).

https://www.lehigh.edu/imi/teched/GlassProcess/Lectures/Lecture09_Hubert_Annealing%20and%20Tempering.pdf

The Annealing Range Concept

There is a lot written about the annealing temperature of a glass being at a single exact temperature. This is another fundamental misunderstanding of the concept - much like CoE meaning compatibility.

The annealing point is mathematically defined as the temperature at which a glass reaches a particular viscosity. This is the temperature at which stress can most quickly be relieved. It is denoted as Tg. Each glass has its own Tg according to colour and composition. The manufacturer recommends a good average Tg for their glass. The first section of this blog post gives a description of the glass transition point. 

A description of the physical changes that occur during annealing. 

An informal discussion of the limiting factors on the annealing range is given in this blog. 

A description of the effects of attempting to anneal at the upper part of the annealing range. 

A description of why annealing at higher temperatures is counter productive. 

Bullseye used to publish three different annealing temperatures for transparent, opalescent, and gold bearing colours and gave an average of these to be the annealing temperature. This was before they began conducting research on annealing of thick slabs. As a result, they were able to determine annealing in the lower portion of the range produces good anneals with reductions in time spent in cooling.

A description of the annealing range and the advantages of low temperature annealing is given in this blog post. 

Although written to counter the mistaken view that CoE can determine the annealing temperature, this blog indicates that the annealing temperature is a choice within a range of temperatures. It also connects annealing soaks with cooling rates. 

The general point is that the annealing soak can occur at any point between the softening point at the top and the strain point at the low part of the temperature range. There are good reasons to avoid annealing above the annealing point (Tg). There are also good reasons to anneal near the strain point of the glass – saving time, electricity, and producing a denser glass. Annealing is critical, but the temperature at which you do it is less so.

 

All this has provoked me. There is so much more to say. So, I have begun a writing an eBook on Annealing – Concepts, Principles and Practice.  In the meantime, more information is given in the eBook Low Temperature Kilnforming

Annealing Range

NOTE: completely revised 31 December 2021

After Bullseye published annealing tables for thick slabs, some people feel they need to use the lower part of the annealing range for all their glass. To determine whether or when to use these tables needs some understanding of the annealing range.

Range

The annealing range of a glass is approximately 40ºC/72ºF on either side of the annealing point, but for practical kiln forming purposes it is normally taken as 33ºC/60ºF. The annealing point is around 510ºC/950ºF for System 96; 516ºC/962ºF for Bullseye and Uroboros for example. The range for a fusing glass will be around 549ºC to 477ºC/1020ºF to 890ºF for fusing glasses. Although the upper half of that range is merely theoretical. The lower end of the range is the strain point.

The annealing soak is to equalise the temperature throughout the glass to within 5ºC. Once the annealing soak is complete, the first stage of cooling begins. This first 55ºC/100ºF below the annealing soak is essential to the adequate annealing of the glass.  And this illustrates the impracticality of annealing in the upper part of the range.  The first cool rate needs to be maintained to at least 55ºC/100ºF below the low end of the annealing range.

To exemplify this. It would be possible to start the annealing at about 550ºC/1020ºF for any of these glasses. But the slow rate of decline in temperature, following the equalisation soak, would need to be maintained for the whole range of 550ºC/1020ºF to 429ºC/805ºF, rather than just the 55ºC/100ºF from the anneal soak point. This would more than double the annealing cool time. This high temperature anneal is a much slower process, which – together with the more rapid relief of stress at the annealing point – is why the top of the range is never used for the temperature equalisation point. It is also why the Spectrum 96 soak above the annealing point was not essential.

Soak

The annealing point is the temperature at which, if all the glass is at the same temperature, the most rapid cooling can take place. To achieve that equalisation temperature (+ or – 5ºC throughout), the glass needs to be soaked at the annealing point for varying lenghts of time relating to thickness and other variables. To complete the anneal and keep the glass within that tight range of temperature, the anneal cool needs to be continued at a steady slow rate.

Lower part of annealing range

Bullseye now recommends the use of 482ºC/900ºF for  the temperature equalisation soak, but have increased the soak time from 30 minutes to one hour. Choosing to start the annealing process at the lower part of the annealing range speeds the process for thick slabs and is very conservative for thinner glass. Bullseye have not changed the composition of their glass so the anything annealed at 516ºC/960ºF for things 6mm/0.25" or less is still properly annealed.

Using the bottom end of the annealing range for thick items, means there are a fewer number of degrees of very slow cooling to the strain point. But this lower soak, or temperature equalisation point, requires a longer soak to equalise the temperature within the glass before the slow steady decline in temperature to maintain the temperature differentials within the glass to less than 5ºC.

Bullseye have found that using a temperature a bit above the bottom end – 482ºC/900ºF – with a long soak reduces the total time in the kiln, but continues to give a good anneal. In the case of Bullseye, 461ºC/863ºF is the bottom end of the annealing range according to the calculations indicated above.