Writing Slumping Schedules

 

Slumping Schedules

When slumping fired pieces, it is most often appropriate to use a slow ramp rate to avoid too rapid expansion of the glass that might lead to a break. Most glass breaks on the ramp up are above 300°C/573°F. It is in this range that there is a rapid expansion of ceramic. This means a slow rate is protective for both glass and ceramic moulds.

This slow first ramp rate is followed by the rate determined as appropriate for profile and thickness. The table below gives rates and times for different profiles that are 6mm/0.25” thick. Of course, the slumping temperature will be altered for the glass according to the manufacturer’s stated range. The nature of the mould will also have a big effect on temperature and time. The soak times at the slump soak are those appropriate for the mould. The annealing soaks are related to the profile of the glass.

Slumping Schedules by Profile (Celsius) 6mm thick

Flat Fuse and Contour Tack

Actual thickness	Ramp 1 rate to 260°C	Soak time (min)	Ramp 2 rate	Slumping  temp. for mould *	Soak time (min)	Anneal as for contour:
6	240	20	240		30	9mm

Rounded Tack

Actual thickness	Ramp 1 rate to 260°C	Soak time (min)	Ramp 2 rate	Slumping  temp. for mould *	Soak time (min)	Anneal as for round tack:
6	150	20	150		30	9mm

Sharp Tack

Actual thickness	Ramp 1 rate to 260°C	Soak time (min)	Ramp 2 rate	Slumping  temp. for mould *	Soak time (min)	Anneal as for sharp tack:
6	120	20	120		30	9mm

 

Slumping Schedules by Profile (Fahrenheit) .025" thick

Flat Fuse and Contour Tack

Actual thickness	Ramp 1 rate to 500°F	Soak time (min)	Ramp 2 rate	Slumping  temp. for mould *	Soak time (min)	Anneal as for:
0.250”	432	20	432		30	0.375”

Rounded Tack

Actual thickness	Ramp 1 rate to 500°F	Soak time (min)	Ramp 2 rate	Slumping  temp. for mould *	Soak time (min)	Anneal for:
0.250”	270	20	270		30	0.375”

Sharp Tack

Actual thickness	Ramp 1 rate to 500°F	Soak time (min)	Ramp 2 rate	Slumping  temp. for mould *	Soak time (min)	Anneal for:
0.250”	216	20	216		30	0.375”

 

Rates

It is most often best to use a slow ramp rate to at least 500°C/933°F. This avoids the risk of inducing a too rapid differential expansion within the glass as it heats up. Experiments about the first ramp rate have shown firing as for two layers thicker than indicated by the profile schedule provides the best results. 

The rates for the anneal soak and cool are those that are one layer thicker than determined by the schedule for the profile. This has been shown by experimentation to give the best annealing result – i.e., least stress.

Temperatures

The slumping temperature needs to be altered for two factors:

• ·        the glass according to the manufacturer’s stated range, and
• ·        the nature of the mould.

Many manufacturers are giving recommended temperatures and times for slumping in their moulds. An example is the Bullseye “Quick Tip” which gives suggested temperatures and times for various sizes and natures of moulds that can form the basis of your independent scheduling of slumps. The rates are normally for flat uniformly thick pieces. This will need alteration for tack profile pieces.

Take note of the soak time in these recommendations. If it is less than 10 minutes, it is possible to reduce the temperature by about 10°C/18°F by using a 30-minute soak. This will reduce marking on the back of the glass.

Soaks / Holds

Slumping schedules tend to be more imprecise than many other operations in kilnforming because of variations in moulds and what is placed on them. This, consequently, makes observation of the slump more important. It is needed from a point below the target temperature – say 22˚C/40°F – to ensure the slump is stopped when it is complete, or extended if not. The controller manual will give the information on how to do both of these operations. In general, schedule slower ramp rates for thicker pieces in combination with the half hour soak. This means for each thickness greater than 6mm, the top temperature can be reduced slightly and still achieve a full slump.

The schedules here are applicable for pieces up to 9mm actual thickness.

Slumping of thicker pieces needs to apply the underlying scheduling method:

• ·        Apply the rate for two layers thicker for the advance to 260°C/500°F.
• ·        Continue the next ramp rate as for two layers thicker than calculated up to the slumping temperature.
• ·        For annealing, also select the rates and times for one layer thicker than indicated by the profile.

For example:

• ·        Rounded Tack of Bullseye, 12mm/0.5” thickness
• ·        Schedule for 25mm/1” (2 times multiplier)

Celsius schedule for up to 9mm actual thickness:

Segment >	1	2	3	4	5	6	7
Rate	150	150	ASAP	15	27	90	off
Temp	260	Top	482	427	370	RT
Time(mins)	20	30	240	0	0	0

and in Fahrenheit:

Segment >	1	2	3	4	5	6	7
Rate	270	270	ASAP	27	49	162	off
Temp	500	Top	900	800	700	RT
Time(mins)	20	30	240	0	0	0

 

A further example:

• ·        Sharp Tack of Bullseye, 0.5” thickness
• ·        Schedule for 31mm/1.25” (2.5 times multiplier)

Celsius schedule for up to 9mm actual thickness:

Segment >	1	2	3	4	5	6	7
Rate	78	78	ASAP	11	20	65	off
Temp	260	Top	482	427	370	RT
Time(mins)	20	30	300	0	0	0

and in Fahrenheit:

Segment >	1	2	3	4	5	6	7
Rate	140	140	ASAP	20	36	117	off
Temp	500	Top	900	800	700	RT
Time(mins)	20	30	300	0	0	0

 

These examples show that considerable differences in scheduling are needed for different tack profiles. It also shows longer annealing soaks and slower cooling rates are required for sharp than rounded tack pieces.

More information is given in the e-book Low TemperatureKilnforming. 

* Of course, the slumping temperature will be altered for the glass according to the manufacturer’s stated range. The nature of the mould will also have a big effect on temperature and time.

Coe and Annealing

If you have changed CoE (i.e., the manufacturer), then the annealing temperature is different. If you don't correct that, it's never going to work quite right.

 

I have several problems with this statement.

CoE does not determine the manufacturer. There are several manufacturers who claim to manufacture fusing glass to the same CoE.

No manufacturer makes to one CoE. All manufacturers have to vary the CoE of a particular glass to balance its viscosity. The CoE is a dependent variable. It depends on what the viscosity of the colour is. Spectrum at one point stated their System96 glass had a 10-point variation in CoE number. Oceanside will be no different. Bullseye have stated a 5-point difference. Other manufacturers have not stated their variations.

No manufacturer can guarantee compatibility with another’s. This is because the ingredients to make a fusing range of glass varies from one manufacturer to another. These variations can make the glass incompatible. To determine if you can combine two glasses from different manufacturers you need to do the compatibility testing yourself. The CoE number does not determine the temperature characteristics of the glass either. 

Annealing 

Having got my disagreements with the statement out of the way, I can go on to looking at differing annealing temperatures. There is a difference between annealing point and annealing temperature.

Annealing Range

Annealing occurs over a relatively small range between the softening point at the higher end to the strain point at the lower end of the range. The softening point is the temperature, above which the glass is so plastic that it cannot be annealed. The strain point is the temperature at which the glass becomes so solid than no annealing can occur below it.

Annealing Point

The annealing point is mathematically determined as the point at which the glass most quickly relieves the stresses within it. That temperature is determined by the viscosity of the glass. It is known as the glass transition point, and is expressed as Tg. In practice there are advantages in annealing at or below the published annealing point.

A soak above the annealing point is of no effect. Any equalisation of temperature that occurs on that soak is negated by the drop to the annealing point. It is better to spend the cumulative soak/hold time at the (lower) annealing temperature.

Annealing Temperature

The average annealing point for Bullseye is 516°C/962°F. Different formulations of their fusing compatible glass have different Tg temperatures. Research showed the best results for their thick glass is 482°C/900°F. Other research in academic institutions has shown that annealing at the lower part of the range provides a denser and stronger finished glass piece. This applies to thick as well as thin glass.

Bullseye has chosen to use a temperature 34°C/61°F below the average annealing point, based on their research. This is still about 7°C/13°F above the strain point. This approach can be applied to any fusing glass.

The strain point is approximately 43°C/78°F below the mathematically determined annealing point. If you know the annealing point you can choose to anneal – i.e., equalise the temperature of your glass – up to 30°C/54°F below that. 

This has a practical demonstration. Wissmach for some years designated 510°C/950°F as the annealing point for W96. A few years ago, they changed their recommended annealing temperature to be 482°C/900°F. The annealing results are good at both temperatures. The difference is that the annealing soak is for a in longer time at the lower than at the higher temperature. But it still provides a shorter annealing cool.

Firing with different anneal points

This apparent diversion - into annealing ranges - shows that it is possible to anneal glass with slightly different glass transition points at the same temperature. You may compromise a little for one glass or the other. You will also use longer times at the annealing temperature.

The annealing soak of Oceanside and Wissmach96 could both be at 482°C/900°F. Or, if it felt safer, it can be an average of the two. The average of the difference would make the annealing soak at 496°C/926°F. You would use a longer soak at this temperature than at the higher one. The safest would be to hold for an hour instead of 30 minutes for 6mm/0.25” of glass.

However, if the annealing point differs greatly, it is much more difficult. For example, float glass with an annealing point of 540°C/1005°F would be difficult to fit in the same firing with most fusing glass because of the wide range of official annealing points.

 

It is possible to anneal different glass at the same time if the annealing points are not widely different. Compromises need to be made.