 |
Credit: Marcy Berman |
I have not had much success [with] the Patty Gray mould despite using
the recommended firing schedule. I always have holes or bubbles and the edges
are not smooth.
The schedule for Oceanside was:
- 111°C/200°F per hour to 537°C1000°F for 15 minutes
- 167°C/300°F per hour to 662°C/1225°F for 30 minutes
- 195°C/350°F per hour to 798°C/1470°F for 20 minutes
- 9999 to 510°C/950°F for 120 minutes
- 55°C/100°F per hour to 371°C/700°F off
Your picture shows a bottom view of the piece - made of cullet pieces -
as fired. Two large bubbles show to have been created from the bottom rising
through the glass to the top.
Although a long bubble squeeze will
not prevent this, it will help to reduce the number of bubbles, and especially
large ones. Because of the number of pieces and the thickness of the glass put
into the mould, a longer bubble squeeze would benefit this piece.
The bubble squeeze can be as you have
done this – at a single temperature – with a soak. In this case, I would have
used 60 to 90 minutes as the soak.
The other bubble squeeze method is to
start the squeeze about 55C/100F below the top of the bubble squeeze. Most
people use a soak of about 30 minutes there. They then proceed at a rate of
between 30C/55F and 55C/100F to the top of the bubble squeeze and soak there
for another 30 minutes. The rates and soak times will vary according to the
thickness or complexity of the piece.
I dispense with the soak at the
beginning of the bubble squeeze on the grounds that at 610/1130F so little
movement will be created that it is a waste of time. I would prefer to have a
slower ramp rate to the top temperature and a longer soak there. I know the
glass will be moving at those temperatures. Many people find the soak at the
beginning of the bubble squeeze successful.
The schedule to the top of the fuse
is faster than the rest of the schedule. When I want a piece to flow, and
especially, to fill gaps, I slow the rate. In this case a rate of between
100C/180F and 167C/300F would be slow enough to allow the glass to flow to fill
gaps.
I want to ensure the glass has enough
time when it is flowing most freely at the top temperature to level out. This
requires scheduling a longer soak at the top and observing how well the glass
is levelling out. If more time is required you can add it on the “run,” and advance to the next segment when the surface is as wanted. Read up in your kiln
manual how to do both these things.
Yes, the rate is one which will
enable devitrification to form on flat glass. The soak at top temperature is
even more likely to promote it. However, as the glass is flowing, less
devitrification has an opportunity to form. The crystallisation – which is what
devitrification is - of the glass takes time to form. The movement of the glass
surface is sufficient to reduce the formation of those crystals. It is of
course likely there will be some devitrification, but not as much as the slow
rates and long soaks would lead you to think.
But for these flows there always is
the possibility of devitrification. You have to plan a method of removing it.
Unless the surface is very flat, grinding the top is not a fast way to remove
it. Sandblasting is a quick way to remove devitrification. Another way is to
sift a thin layer of clear glass powder over the surface. This is an
increasingly popular way to deal with devitrification for those without access
to sandblasting facilities. When fired again, the powder melts and forms a new
shining surface. The piece will need to be fired fire again whether sandblasted
or covered in glass powder.
The summary for flows:
- Slow down to top
temperature.
- Give sufficient
time there to get the flow needed.
- Observe the
progress as you near the top temperature.
- Extend the soak or
advance to the next segment when the surface is smooth.
- Anneal soak for the
calculated thickness.
- Use a three-stage
cool – as outlined in the Bullseye chart for annealing thick slabs - to ensure
no temporary contraction stresses are created.
- Accept there will
be devitrification.