The Relationship of Stress and Slumping

From time to time the assertion is that a break during the heat up of a blank while slumping is the result of residual stress remaining in an under-annealed blank.  Is there a relationship between inadequate annealing and slumping breaks?

It seems to be the general consensus that it is true.

It is clear that poorly annealed glass is more likely to break.  The assumption is that the additional bending stress added to the existing stress, causes a break.  Even if the fused piece is stressed, but not enough to break, a slow heat up would avoid the build up of stress to breaking level.  After all, the means of relieving the stress of toughened/tempered glass is by a slow heat up to allow the stress between the interior and surface to be equalised.  The same principle should apply to stressed glass in a slump.  My contention is that the ramp rates for the slump have been too fast to relieve any additional stress applied by the bending of the glass.

I hear of very few people testing for stress after any firing.  I read of people asserting the existing stress is amplified on the slump firing.  I do not read of any experience of people testing their flat piece, discovering excess stress, and  re-firing to relieve the stress before slumping, but the assertion of excess stress from the first firing continues as a cause.

Without testing there is no way to know whether the first firing had excessive stress.  The use of polarising filters is such a simple, easy and quick way to determine if there are stress problems in the fired and cooled piece.  It should be the business of practitioners and teachers to assert the need for stress testing as the next task when the glass has cooled. Unless people asserting this possibility do the testing of their proposition, it can only remain among the untested elements of kilnforming.

If there were to be a lot of stress in the flat blank, it needs to be fired again, annealed longer and cooled more slowly than previously to relieve the stress before any other process is conducted.  The firing to relieve the stress needs to be only to the lower portion of the slumping range at maximum.  

Each piece that is intended for further firing, needs to be tested for stress before the next firing, and not just at the end of the firing sequence.  To get an accurate reading of the stress, the piece must be allowed to cool until the internal temperature equals the surface temperature.  This may take overnight, but at least as long as the combined anneal soak and the associated cool. The delay caused by waiting for the complete cool may encourage people to skip the stress testing.  But it is risky to avoid testing for stress because of impatience.  Another firing can be conducted while waiting for the first piece to completely cool.

Annealing sufficiently on every firing is the way to ensure that any slumping break is not the consequence of stress from the previous firing.  The Bullseye sheet Annealing Thick Slabs (Celsius and Fahrenheit) gives the annealing times and cool rates.  This document applies to all fusing glass, except the annealing temperature used. Study the table, and follow it closely.  Keep in mind that the effective thickness for other than full fuse, is between 1.5 to 2.5 times the thickest part.  After that first firing, test the piece for stress when it has cooled sufficiently.  It is also important to test the successfully slumped piece for stress before using, gifting, or selling it.