Deep Slumps with Bubbles

 

Photo Credit: Rachel Meadows-Ibrahim

The main causes of the large thin bubble is most probably  too high a temperature combined with a long soak.

Elevation of the Mould

The poster indicated there are eight holes total – four on the sides and four under the glass. This means any air has an exit out from under the glass and from the inside of the mould. So, in this case it does not need to be elevated for exit of air.  In my practice l have never, except in tests, elevated my slumping moulds. I have not had failures. My experiments involved in writing the eBook Low Temperature Kilnforming  showed no significant temperature differences between elevating, or not, below the mould.

Effect of Fast Rates

Slow rates to low temperatures with long soaks avoid sealing the glass to the mould. This means air can move out from under the glass during the slump. 

• Fast rates, and elevated temperatures can restrict air movement from under the slumping glass.  
• Fast rates and high slump temperatures can each cause uprisings because the glass slides down the mould during the soak, and that weight pushes the bottom upwards.

Temperature and Uprisings

This uprising is different from the bubble at the bottom on this piece. It is possible to see the glass bubble is thinner than the surrounding glass. As there were holes for air to escape, it seems the temperature and or speed was great enough to allow the glass to form to the mould at the bottom.  This covered the air holes and allowed the remaining air to push upwards on the glass.  A lower top temperature may have avoided this bubble formation.  Certainly, a combination of a slower rate and a lower temperature would have avoided the formation of the bubble.

Observation

Further, observation during the firing would have caught this bubble formation early enough to skip to the annealing and result in a piece with only a slight uprising, and before it became a bubble. Peeking should start at the beginning of the slumping soak and be repeated at 5 to 10 minute intervals.

Slumping Strategy

A schedule was presented for a slumping problem of a 6mm/0.25” blank.  It consisted of three segments each of a rate of 277C/500F with short holds up to 399C/750F and then a rapid rise to 745C/1375F.  The cool was done with two long holds at 537C/1000F and 482C/900F followed by cooling rates for 12mm/0.5”

My response was that, yes it was fired too high.  Not only that, but the firing strategy, as shown by the schedule, is odd. 

Strategy

The general strategy for slumping follows these ideas.

·        Glass is slow to absorb heat, and in one sense, this schedule accepts that by having short soaks at intervals.  As glass is slow to absorb heat, it is necessary to use slow ramp rates and without pauses and changes in rates.  This should be applied all the way to the slumping temperature.

·        Holds of short durations are not effective at any stage in a slumping firing.  The objective is to allow the glass time to form to the mould with as little marking as possible.  This implies slow rates to low temperatures with significant holds at appropriate stages.  This about putting enough heat work into the glass that higher temperatures are not needed.

·        This kind of firing requires observation for new moulds and new arrangements of glass to ensure the slump is complete.  Once you know the mould requirements and are repeating the layup of the glass, the firing records will tell you what rates and times to use to get a complete slump with minimum marking.

·        The hold at annealing temperature is to equalise the temperature throughout the glass to produce a stress-free result.  Any soaks above are negated or repeated by the necessary soak at the annealing temperature.  The hold there must be long enough to complete the temperature equalisation that is the annealing.

·        My work has shown that annealing for one (3mm/0.125”) layer thicker produces a piece with less stress.  This indicates that a 6mm/0.25” piece should be annealed as for 9mm/0.35” to get the best result.

The summary of the firing strategy for slumping is:

• ·        A single ramp of a slow rate to the slumping temperature.
• ·        Observation of the progress of the slump to determine the lowest practical temperature and hold time.
• ·        Annealing for one layer thicker that being slumped.
• ·        Three stage cooling of the piece at rates related to the annealing hold.

Critique

This is a critique of the schedule. For comparison, my schedule for a full fused 6mm blank would be different.

• ·        140ºC/250ºF to 677º/1250ºF for 30 to 45 minutes.
• ·        9999 to 482ºC/900ºF for 1.5 hours
• ·        69ºC/124ºF to 427ºC/800ºF, no hold
• ·        125ºC/225ºF to 371ºC/700ºF, no hold
• ·        330ºC/600ºF to room temperature, off.

The rate of the published schedule is fast for a full fused blank and extremely fast for a tack fused blank. This needs to be slowed.  The schedule provides a single (fast) rate of heating, but with unnecessary holds.  The holds are so short as to be ineffective, anyway. There is no need for the holds on the way up to the slumping temperature.  In general slumping schedules are of fewer segments.   This is because glass behaves well with steady slow inputs of heat.

Then strangely, the schedule increases the rate to top temperature.  It does so with a brief soak at 593ºC/1100ºF.  This fast rate of 333ºC/ 600ºF begins at 400ºC/750ºF.  This is still in the brittle phase of the glass and risks breaking the glass.  The brittle stage ends around 540ºC/ 1005ºF.

This rapid rate softens the surface and edges of the glass without allowing time for the underside to catch up.  This explains uneven edges.  It also risks breaking the glass from too great expansion of the top before the bottom.

Additionally, the schedule uses a temperature more than 55ºC/100ºF above what is a reasonable highest slumping temperature.  The top temperature of this schedule is in the tack fusing range.

There is no need for a hold 55ºC/100ºF above annealing soak. It is the annealing soak that equalises the temperature before the cool begins.  The higher temperature equalisation is negated by the cooler soak at annealing temperature. So, the hold at the higher temperature and slow cool to the annealing temperature only delays the firing by about two hours.  It does not have any effect on the final piece.

The schedule is cooling for a piece of 12mm/0.5”.  This is slower than necessary.  As noted above, cooling for one layer thicker than the piece is advisable to get the most stress free result.  The annealing soak could be 1.5 hours following this idea.  Cooling with a three stage schedule reduces the risk of inducing temporary stresses that might break the glass.  Although the initial cooling rate I recommend is very similar to this schedule, it safely reduces the total cooling time.

• ·        69ºC/124ºF to 427ºC/800ºF, no hold
• ·        125ºC/225ºF to 371ºC/700ºF, no hold
• ·        330ºC/600ºF to room temperature, off.

Using my kind of schedule for the first time will require peeking once top temperature is reached to determine when the slump is complete. It may take as much as an hour. Be prepared to either extend the hold, or to skip to the next segment if complete earlier. The controller manual will explain how.

 More information is given in Low Temperature Kilnforming, An Evidence-based guide to scheduling.  Available from Etsy and Bullseye

Problems when Slumping

A range of problems appear in slumping.  These include bubbles, splits, puddling and more. Several causes are possible.  This blog looks at the problems, possible causes and remedies.

Bubbles

Blocked Vent Holes

 Absence of, or blocked holes at the bottom of the mould to allow air out into the kiln on all but shallow or cylindrical moulds can be a cause of bubbles. Prop the mould up on stilts if the hole does not go directly from under the glass and out of the side of the mould. Alternatively, drill a hole in the side to allow the air to escape from under the mould.

Wet moulds

In kiln forming, the moisture resulting from recently applied kiln wash is considered by some to be a cause of bubbles. The water in the mould will be evaporated by around 250°C/482°F in any sensible slumping schedule. At this temperature, the glass will not have begun to move, so the moisture can move out of the mould through any vent holes at the bottom of the mould, or past the glass as it rests on the edge of the mould.

The circumstance when a damp slumping mould could cause difficulties is when using an extremely fast rise of temperature. This is detrimental to the mould also, as the rapid formation of steam is more likely to break the mould rather than the glass. It is also unlikely to result in a good slump conforming to the mould without significant marking.

In casting with wet plaster/silica moulds water vapour can move toward the glass. Casting practice has alleviated some of the problem, by having an extended steam out before 200°C/395°F, or pouring the glass into the hot dry mould from a reservoir.

In pate de verre, the mould is most often packed while wet. The small particles normally allow any steaming of moisture to pass through, and so be dry at forming temperatures without blowing any bubbles.

Top Temperature

Bubbles at the bottom of the glass are much more likely to be the result of too high a process temperature if the previous two conditions are met. This high temperature allows the glass to slide down the mould.  The glass is not plastic enough to thicken and form a puddle at the bottom at most slumping temperatures. Instead, it begins to be pushed up from the lowest point due to the weight of the glass sliding down the sides.

 

Avoiding uprisings on the bottom of bowls.

Vent Holes

Make sure the holes are clear before placing the glass.

Wet Moulds

Ensure that the moulds are no more than damp before placing in the kiln.

Top Temperature

Firing for too long or at too high a temperature will cause the glass to continue sliding down. Having nowhere else to go, the bottom begins rising. This is the result of the weight of glass pressing down onto the bottom, especially on steep-sided moulds. This is a consistent experience across several kilns and with multiple users.

Low Slumping Temperatures.

Glass at low temperatures is affected largely by its weight and viscosity.

Viscosity Effects

Thick glass will fall more slowly than thin, when using the same schedule. Thick glass takes longer to equalise the upper and lower surface temperatures. Since the lower surface is stiffer (has a higher viscosity) it will move less using the same heat up rate. This means slower rates should be used, or a significant soak just above the strain point will be required. This softening of the glass evenly throughout the rise to the top temperature is critical in obtaining even slumps.

Splits in slumps

Without the slow progress to top temperature there can be problems. Sometimes the upper surface of the slump appears fine. It is the bottom that exhibits a split or tear that does not go all the way to the upper surface of the glass. It indicates the rate of advance was too - but only just - too fast to achieve the desired result.

 The ramp rate has been quick enough to get the top heated and become plastic. But the lower surface is still cold enough that it is brittle. The weight of the upper softened glass begins to push down before the bottom has become hot enough to be fully plastic. The force of the weight on the bottom can be enough to cause the glass to separate, rather than move as the surface does. This split on the bottom but not the top indicates a slower rate for that thickness is required. This shows the interaction between viscosity and weight.

 Sometimes the split is evident from the top. The cause of this kind of split is the same as a split on the bottom. But the ramp rate has been much faster in relation to the thickness or profile of the piece.

Weight

It is possible to have glass slightly overhang slumping moulds if you use low temperatures. The glass has the appearance of behaving differently at these low temperatures than at fusing temperatures.  

 

At low temperatures it cannot form exactly to the mould. It falls first in the middle. Because the glass is not very plastic, the edges rise up from the mould at first, because the weight there is not great enough to allow the unsupported glass to bend. The edges stay in line with the beginning of the bend in the middle.  

 

At the beginning of the slump the glass is not soft enough to stretch. It maintains its dimensions as it falls. For deep moulds, the glass moves progressively to move over the lip of the mould and begins to fall into the mould.

As the slump proceeds, the glass stretches very little and so the edges move further down the mould. The glass continues to slide down at the edges until the centre settles down onto the mould bottom. 

During this slide into place, the glass can become marked. This is usually most evident on back of the upper portions of the glass where most sliding is happening.

 With higher than necessary temperatures, the glass can continue to slide down the mould. Since the glass is still not fully plastic, the weight pushes the glass at the bottom upwards. This gives the appearance of a bubble, but is an uprising due to the pressure of the glass at the sides of the mould.

 

During the sliding of the glass along the mould, it becomes more marked. The marks often look like stretch marks. And in many senses, it is exactly that.

At higher temperatures or longer holds, the glass softens more. At this point the uprising collapses and the glass begins to thicken at the bottom. It also thins slightly at the top.

Remedies

Ramp Rates

The ramp rates should be slow.

• ·        This allows the glass to heat evenly throughout. This is important to get even slumps. 
•          Contrasting colours or a combination of opalescent and transparent glasses heat evenly with slow rates.
• ·        Slow rates allow glass with tack profiles to heat evenly.
• ·        It helps avoid splits in the bottom of slumped glass.
• ·        It allows lower slump temperature to be used.

Low Temperatures

Using the lowest practical slumping temperature gives the best results.

• ·        It allows glass with small overhangs of the mould to be successfully slumped.
• ·        Low temperature reduces the mould marks on the back of the glass.
• ·        Fewer stretch marks are in evidence.
• ·        Low slumping temperatures with long soaks reduce the uneven slump that is sometimes in evidence with deeper moulds.
• ·        Low temperatures allow different colours to heat more evenly.
• ·        Low temperatures reduce the thinning or thickening of glass in a high temperature slump.

More information is available here.

This information shows you need to keep the slumping temperature to the minimum required. To find out what that temperature is, watch the slumping in stages in brief peeks (do not stare!). Look at the piece for a second or two every five minutes before you reach your desired temperature and at intervals throughout the hold.

If it has slumped completely at the beginning of the hold, you are firing too high. Reduce your temperature in subsequent firings and watch in the same way to find what the required temperature and time is. There is absolutely no substitute in slumping but to watch by peeking to learn what your mould and glass require. 

What Temperature?

To determine the temperature needed for your piece, use slow ramp rates – between 100°C to 150°C/ 180°F to 270°F. Set your top temperature around 630°C/1170°F for a simple slump of fusing glass. For bottle or window glass you will need a temperature closer to 720°C/1330°F.

It is necessary to observe the progress of the slump as you do not know the best slumping temperature. Start watching the glass at about 10-minute intervals from about 600°C/1110°F. There is not much light in the kiln at this temperature, so an external light is useful. You can also observe the reflections of the elements on the glass. When the image of the elements begins to curve, you know the glass is beginning to bend. You then know that is the lowest possible slumping temperature when using that ramp rate.

Hold for at least 30 mins at the temperature when the glass begins to visibly drop. This may or may not be long enough. Continue checking at 5-10 minute intervals to know when the slump is complete. If the glass is completely slumped before the soak time is finished, advance to the next segment. If not fully slumped, you need to extend the soak time. These operations mean you need to know how to alter your schedule while firing. Consult your controller manual to learn how to do these things. Stop the hold when complete and advance to the anneal.

In some cases, you may need to increase temperature you set by 5-10°C. You can do this by scheduling a couple of segments with 10°C/18°F higher temperature each and 30 minute soaks each.  If you do not need them, you can skip them. If you do need the extra temperature, you have it scheduled already.  You will know if you need the extra segments by whether the glass has begun to curve at the start of the first of the soaks.  If it has not after 10 minutes, skip to the next segment. Once the new temperature has been reached, check for a curve in the glass. Again, if after 10 minutes there is no curve, skip to the next (higher temperature) segment.

A low temperature slump will allow the glass to conform to the shape of the mould without softening so much that it takes up all the markings of the mould. That in turn means there are spaces for the air to escape from under the glass all the way to the slumping temperature as well as through the air holes at the bottom. It also gives the most mark-free slump possible for your shape.

If you are slumping at such a temperature that the glass has sealed to the mould, you are firing too hot anyway. Or put more positively, use a low temperature slump, that is, a slump at the lowest temperature to achieve the desired result over an extended period of your choice.

More information is available in the eBook Low Temperature Kilnforming available through Etsy or Bullseye.

Slump Shrinkage

Glass on rectangular moulds often does not maintain a straight edge.  It pulls in and tends toward the “dog boning” of fused single layer glass even if not so dramatic.

Explanation

The reasons for the pull-in on rectangular moulds are similar to those for dog boning. You should note that squares are special cases of the general class of rectangles. The discussion here applies squares just as much as to rectangles.

If you grid the rectangular glass, it illustrates that the glass in the corners is moving in two directions.  It is moving and slightly stretching into the mould.  At the same time, it is trying to compress into the corner of the mould.  The glass along the sides are moving in only one direction – stretching only slightly and moving toward the bottom of the mould.

There is more compression than stretching in the corners. The sides have only to move in one direction and experience no compression and so move toward the bottom more easily.

Such is my explanation of the experience. 

Avoidance

The real question then is how to prevent this pull-in that is so commonly experienced on rectangular moulds with no rims.  One way would be to avoid such moulds altogether.  This of course, is not practical, so some approaches to compensate or avoid the problem are needed.

It is possible to compensate for this pull-in by slumping a rectangle with slightly bulging sides.  Rather than a regular rectangle, you create one with slightly outwardly curved sides.  Getting the exact amount of curve will be difficult and achieved only after a number of experiments.

The opposite compensation would be to round the corners of the glass, so there will not be so much glass to fit into the corners of the mould.  This again will require experimentation to achieve a predictable result.  And it often would interfere with the appearance of the final piece.

The easiest, but not always successful, way to prevent the pull-in is to alter the scheduling for slumps on such moulds.  It is a well-known property of glass that it does not have a single softening point, but progressively softens with temperature and time.  You can take advantage of this by using four elements in combination. 

·        Use a slow rate of advance to the slump temperature, to allow the glass to evenly absorb a lot of heat on the way to slumping. 

·        Use a low slumping temperature  This may be as much as 30°C less than your usual temperature.

·        Use a long soak at the slumping temperature.  This may be hours.  You need to allow the glass to slump into the mould without stretching.  To avoid stretching, you need a low temperature.  At low temperatures, the glass requires a lot of time to conform to the mould.

·        Observe at 10- to 15-minute intervals once the slumping temperature is achieved.

These processes are outlined in a blog post on dog boning.  Further information is available in the ebook: Low Temperature Kiln Forming.

Avoidance of pull-in of the glass on rectangular moulds is related to scheduling and observance.  There are some compensations that can be tried, but require considerable experimentation to be successful.

Frosting on slumped glass

 [We’re] Having a few challenges with a stainless-steel S-curve mould (15cm x 10cm [prepared with boron nitride]. … When we slump a piece of glass, we get a frosted effect … in places where the glass was touching the mould at the beginning. I don't think it's devitrification, because the glass itself isn't cloudy, it's just hundreds of little bumps and dimples.

Photo credit: Adrian Cresswell

 This is a mould that combines draping and slumping in the same firing. The glass must drape over the hump and slump into the valley at the same time. This is effectively two processes in the same firing. It does require some compromise in scheduling as a result.

 The evidence presented shows boron nitride – a slippery surface – was used to prepare the mould. In another firing Thinfire – a powdered surface – was used as a separator. Both created this marking on the back. The schedule was not presented.

 This indicates something other than the separator is creating the problem. Note that the marking also occurs at the extreme right end where the glass would be resting on the lip of the mould. The marking does not occur where the glass is slumping down into the curve. It only occurs where the glass is draping.

 As suggested, this is not devitrification. That occurs on the surface rather than on the bottom. This further indicates the difficulty is between the glass and the mould.

 I suggest the marks are from the glass sliding along the mould. These are frequently called stretch marks. The glass is sliding and stretching along the mould. This blog post contains much more information.

 It is of course possible that insufficient boron nitride was placed on the steel and the glass grabbed the steel. It is worth checking, although I don’t think it likely.

 You might think the Thinfire covering of the steel would make everything smooth. However, Thinfire turns to powder and fibreglass particles after about 400°C/753°F. These particles are drawn along as the glass moves against the mould. The particles can bunch and remain as bumps on the surface of the mould. This may account for the rougher surface with Thinfire than boron nitride.

A summary

These stretch marks occur when the glass moves excessively against the mould. This is usually a combination of high temperature and fast ramp rates. Slumping should be done at the lowest practical temperature. The soak should be long, rather than brief.

The Remedy

 Fire more slowly and to a lower temperature. The Bullseye suggestion from their quick tips is for a double curve (or wave) mould of 250 x 210 x 40 mm (9.85" x 8.25" x 1.6"). They suggest a ramp rate of 167°C to 660°C /1221°F with a soak of 10 minutes for a 6mm/0.25” thick piece.

 In my experience this is too fast. Slumping into this mould can be done at 630°C/1167°F with a 30-minute soak in my kilns using the same ramp rate.

 This is a simple mould to slump and drape into. It is essentially two partial cylinders pushed together in opposite directions. The curves are gentle and progressive. There are no sharp changes of direction. These factors mean that the slow and low approach will work well.

 However, in this case the curves will be even tighter as the full length is 150mm x 100mm/ 6” x 4”. The height is not given, but for a self-standing piece, it likely to be a minimum of 40mm/1.6". This makes for a tight curve on the mould. It is likely the glass will slide more than on a gentle curve. My thought is that the steel mould has been produced without knowledge - or testing - of the practicalities of getting the glass to bend to such a small radius. This means that I would be trying a schedule of about 125°C/225°F per hour to a top temperature of about 630°C/1167°F with a 1.0 to a 1.5-hour soak. The glass is going slump much more slowly with this smaller span.

 With gentle heating -slow ramp rate, long soak - the glass gradually conforms to the shape of the mould without stretching over the hump/crest of the mould. Instead, what happens is that the glass slips slightly from the opposite end of the mould. To counteract this, I place the glass 6mm/0.25” over the upraised end of the ceramic mould. This then finishes just inside the mould’s edge.

 With a steel mould, this is not possible without the glass hanging up on the hot and sharp edge. The glass will need to be at the edge or just inside to prevent hanging up on the end of the mould. The glass will slip down the mould a little, but not so much as to cause problems. It is possible to prop a piece of fibre board at the upturned end of the wave mould to support the overhanging glass if the full curve is required.

 The glass on the high part of the mould will not stretch at the low temperature, but gradually conform to the shape of the mould.

 I have much more information on this and other things in the eBook:

Low Temperature Kilnforming; an Evidence-Based Approach to Scheduling

 

Incomplete definition on texture moulds

An enquiry on incomplete definition in the glass from texture moulds:

I have this texture mould, but I’m not getting much definition. I’m using a single 3mm layer of 96. Do I need to go hotter for longer?

155C - 750C, 15 minutes

Full - 516C, 140 minutes

49C - 371C, 0 minutes

Full - 49C, off

My response:

You have sensibly increased the temperature at a moderately slow rate (for 3mm).  This ensures the glass is evenly heated through by the time it reaches the working temperature.  It is slow enough for you to be confident that most of the air has been squeezed out.

If you wanted to be more cautious about bubbles,  you could introduce a slow increase in temperature - maybe 50°C - from 600°C to 650°C.  You may want to soak there for 30 minutes, although it may not be necessary.  Once that segment is finished you can resume at 75°C to the top temperature.

I would not increase the temperature as you are already at risk of dog-boning the glass.  I would extend the soak time to 180 minutes at 750°C. You need to check frequently after the top temperature is achieved.  A quick peek is all that is required to see if the texture is fully reflected in the top surface.  You may find success by using a lower temperature, say 730°C, but it will require at least an hour more soak time.

The piece above conformed completely to the 12mm depth of the mould with a soak of three hours at 750°C. There was incomplete formation of another test piece at 740°C for three hours. So the 10°C made enough difference for complete formation over this depth.  With less extreme heights, a lower temperature or a shorter soak would be possible.

Once the texture is assured, you need to advance to the next segment.  Or, if it is not achieved by 10 minutes before the end, extend the soak.  Check your controller manual on how to skip to the next segment, or to extend the soak.

As an aside, your annealing soak and cool is very long and slow for 3mm.  You can regain the time used in the slow ramp rate and soak. Review the requirements for a single sheet of glass.  A 60-minute annealing soak and a cool rate of 83°C/hr. to 370°C is an adequately slow anneal cool for a 3mm piece.

You may find more success with a 6mm sheet.  The weight of glass helps it conform to the texture mould.  I have found that a slow ramp rate (about 150°C) to the strain point of ca. 540°C, followed by half that rate to top temperature allows a reduction in soak time to achieve the required definition. This reduction in soak time can be one half hour less than the time required to get good definition on a 3mm sheet.

The strategy outlined here for the scheduling is using the principle of slow and low and long firings.  It is much easier to control the results of the firing by using moderate ramp rates to lower temperatures combined with longer soaks and periodic peeking to check on progress.

If you do not have the time to devote to peeking when the schedule is at the top temperature, you should investigate the method of programming a delay to the start of the firing.  Your controller manual will give the method of using this function.

Texture moulds work well with the slow and low principle of kilnforming.  Long soaks may be required with periodic observation to determine when the process is complete.

Further information is available in the e-book: Low Temperature Kilnforming.

Texture moulds

"I could use some help here please. I’ve tried this sun mould 3x and as you can see all 3x I get a hole.  If you could tell me what I’ve done wrong I would greatly appreciate. They were all full fused to 1430F (776C)."

Example of the problem

There are a range of views that have been given on how to make texture moulds work without the glass developing bubbles.

closer view of one example

These are a summary of the suggestions made to the enquirer.

Not enough glass thickness. The view is that glass needs to be 6mm thick to be used on texture moulds, as the viscosity of glass tends to draw glass to that thickness, robbing from other areas making them thin and prone to bubbles.

Glass always wants to go to 6mm.  Not always.  It depends on temperature.  The kiln forming temperatures we use results in a viscosity that tends to equalise the forces at 6 – 7 mm.  Hotter glass will flow out more thinly, until at about 1200C, the glass is 1mm or less thick.

Full fuse two sheets first.  The object is to avoid placing two separate sheets on top of the mould, creating the potential for more bubbles between the sheets, as they may slump into the mould at different rates.

Too hot. As the glass increases in temperature the viscosity is reduced and can no longer resist the air pressure underneath the glass.

Use a lower temperature. The idea is to keep the glass relatively stiff to resist bubble formation.

Bubble squeeze needed to avoid trapped air.  Another way to reduce the amount of air under the glass is to allow the glass to relax slowly at a temperature below which the glass becomes sticky.

Elevate the mould.  The idea is that hot air circulating under the mould will help equalise the temperature of the mould and the glass.

Drill holes at low points. This gives air escape routes under the mould, assuming the mould is slightly elevated.

Go lower and slower.  Use a slower rate of advance toward a lower top temperature with longer soaks to avoid reducing the viscosity, but still get the impression from the mould.

Now for a different viewpoint.

None of the views given above are wrong, but they all (except in one case) fail to consider the fundamentals of obtaining texture from such a mould.

It is apparent that the temperature used was too high because the glass had low enough viscosity to allow the air underneath to blow the bubble.  The suggestions of thicker glass, bubble squeezes, lower temperatures, drilling holes and elevation of the mould are ways of reducing the amount of air or resisting the air pressure.  They are not wrong, but miss the fundamental point.

That fundamental point is that you need to raise the temperature slowly on these texture moulds to allow the glass to fully heat throughout. By doing this most of the air has a chance to filter out from under the glass before it conforms to the edges of the mould.  It is simpler to use the slow advance rather than a quick one with a slow-down for a bubble squeeze.  The glass is more certain to be the same temperature throughout by using a slow rate of advance.  Glass with an even temperature can conform more easily to the undulations and textures of the mould.

Mostly, the recommendations given are to use two layers, or 6mm of glass that has already been fused together.  This gives greater resistance to bubble formation and reduces the dogboning and needling of the edges.

However, you can form in these moulds with single layers.  There are of course certain conditions:

• You must advance the temperature slowly.  A rate of 100C per hour will be fast enough.
• You can add a bubble squeeze soak of 30 minutes at about 630C as additional assurance of removing most of the air.  The bubble squeeze is done at a lower temperature than usual, as the glass is less viscous because the slow rate of advance has put more heat work into the glass.
• The top temperature should not go beyond 720C. Beyond that temperature the viscosity of the glass drops quickly and so becomes subject to bubble formation.

The soak at the forming temperature will need to be long and observation will be needed to determine when the glass has fully conformed to the mould. Quick peeks at intervals will show when the design is visible on the top of the glass. The time will vary by:

• Mould texture complexity 
• Type of glass (opalescent or transparent),
• Heat forming characteristics of the glass,
• Viscosity of the glass or colour,
• Etc. 

Be knowledgeable about how to extend the soak or to advance to the next segment of the schedule to take advantage of your observations.

Your observation may show that you can do the texture formation at a lower temperature in future. This will provide results with less separator pickup and better conformation to the mould without excessive marking. 

You will need a long soak in either circumstance. This will be in terms of hours not minutes.  If you do these texture moulds at slumping temperatures, you will probably need at least twice your normal soak.

You can do a lot to fool the single layer glass into doing what you want by using low temperatures and long soaks. See Bob Leatherbarrows's book on Firing Schedules.  He gives a lot of information on how to manipulate glass through heat work - the combination of temperature and time.  You might also consider obtaining my book - Low Temperature Kilnforming.

Most of the search for the right temperature, fails to note that the important element is how you get to the temperature. You can get the same result at different temperatures by using different rates of advance.

Kilnforming is more than temperature, it is also about time and the rate of getting to the temperature. By concentrating on temperature, we miss out on controlling the speed and the soak times. You can do so much more to control the behaviour of the glass at slow rates, significantly long soaks, and low temperatures.