Most slumping breaks
are due to scheduling. The piece to be
slumped has survived the fuse, and with good practice will have been tested for
stress. It has passed all the compatibility and annealing complications, so it is
sound.
There are things you
should think about when determining the schedule for slumping. General
considerations are thickness, and degree of fuse. There are many other factors
to be considered – such as depth, mould detail, span, colour contrasts, etc.
These will affect the scheduling in detail rather than the general approach.
Ramp Rates
In general, the
scheduling for the first ramp rate is done by taking note of profile (degree of
fuse), and so, its effective thickness.
Each profile of fused
glass has its own considerations. Full
fused pieces can be fired at the rate recommended by the many schedules for
slumping fused items. Tack fused and other glass configurations need further
precautions.
The ramp rate for
slumping should be no faster than a rate to ensure the glass is evenly heated
throughout the rise to the slumping temperature. I recommend that this rate of
advance should be a steady single rate all the way to the slumping
temperature. There is no need for
soaking at any point during this temperature rise.
But as much of the
breaking of glass occurs below 300°C (573°F), a precaution can be added. An
additional slower first ramp can be inserted with a 20-minute soak at 260°C/500°F
before proceeding. This also helps protect ceramic moulds which have a cristobalite inversion at that temperature.
The rates for moulds
that are large relative to kiln size, that are heavy, or may be damp, should be
considerably slower than for other glass.
Force of Breaks
If the glass has
broken during the forming process, take note of the distance between the
pieces. The amount of space between the
broken pieces shows the relative force that caused the break. Greater space is related to more stress; lesser
space or only partial cracks indicate lower levels of stress. The separation distance indicates the degree
of change required in scheduling. A small parting of the glass requires only a
little reduction in the rate. Large
spaces indicate that much slower rates are required, and possibly a complete
rethink of the schedule.
This approach can be
used for breaks on the heat up or the cool down. Whether the glass is rounded or sharp, the
force of the break will still be an indicator of the degree of change
required. On a rounded edge break, it is
the heating rate that needs to be slowed.
Sharp-edged breaks indicate that the anneal soak needs to be lengthened
and the anneal cool slowed. The rounded
versus sharp edges are more difficult to establish at these low temperatures
and need to be combined with how well the formed pieces match. Of course, there will be some experimentation
required to determine the exact amount of change needed.
Often people
experience breaks even though the set up was similar and the schedule was the
same for successful pieces in the past.
There are two responses to this – “what did you change for the setup and
firing of this piece from others?”, and “You have been skating on the edge of
disaster for a while”. Glass behaviour
is predictable. Since the break occurred when the setup was similar, and the
schedule was the same, something else has changed.
Consider what was
different. Review the differences in set
up of the piece – colours, arrangement, thickness, volume of material used –
everything that might be different at each stage of the layup. Note these differences and review them one by
one.
- · Could
have any one element been sufficient to make the firing conditions
different?
- · Could a
combination of these differences have been significant?
- · Are
there any differences in the firing schedule?
- · Have you
made any little tweaks in the schedule?
- · What is
different? Different times of the day, different power supply, plugs in or out,
venting, peeking, different shelves (or none) – any small thing that could have
introduced a variable in the firing conditions.
For each of these
differences consider what needs to be altered, if anything, for a successful
firing. Combine these small tweaks into
a full schedule and run it as an experiment.