Many people
advocate the elevation of moulds. Mainly
for air flow to equalise temperatures above and below the mould. But also, to prolong the life of the mould. My observation on these reasons for elevating
the mould are that they are not harmful, but not necessary, except for investment moulds.
My experiments have showed insignificant differences in temperatures above
and below whether elevated or not. Since the air temperature under the
mould is much the same whether elevated or not, it indicates that elevation of
the mould has no significant effect. But,
of course, elevation of the mould does no harm either.
More important than
elevation of the mould, is consideration of the nature of the ceramic mould. Ceramics
have two expansion/contraction temperatures called inversions. The first is at 226˚C/439˚F, and the
second around 570˚C/1058˚F. The ceramic expands rapidly at these
temperatures. There is a 2.5% increase
in volume at 226˚C and a slightly more gradual 1% increase around 570˚C.
This a main reason
to use slow ramp rates up to at least 570˚C/1058˚F. Slower rates ease the ceramic expansion speed
and reduces the risk of breaking. So,
slower rates will lengthen the life of ceramic moulds. The cool down for
annealing and cooling is slow enough that it presents no risk for the ceramic.
There are occasions
when the mould must be elevated, though. These are when the mould is large, heavy, or
damp. This is to protect the shelf
rather than the mould or glass.