Sample Tiles

credit: Tia Murphy

There are advocates for making tiles as references for future work.  

• They show the profiles achieved at different temperatures.  
• They can be stored for easy visual reference when planning a firing.  
• It is a useful practice for any kiln new to the user.  

These tiles are assembled in identical ways to enable comparisons.  They should include black and white, iridised pieces- up and down, transparent and opal, and optionally stringers, confetti, millefiori, frit and enamels.  

The tiles are fired at different top temperatures with the same heat up schedule with the top temperature of each at about 10C or 20F intervals.  These show what effect different temperatures give.  Start the temperature intervals at about 720C or 1330F.

This is a good practice, even if time consuming.  It gets you familiar with your kiln and its operation.  It gives a reference for the profiles that are achieved with different temperatures at the rates used.

Ramp rate and time

But, as with many things in kilnforming, it is a little more complicated.  The effect you achieve is affected by rate and time used as well as the temperature.

The firing rate is almost as important as the temperature.  

• A slow rate to the same top temperature will give a different result than a fast rate.  
• The amount of heat work put into the glass will affect the temperature required.  
• Slow rates increase the time available for the glass to absorb the heat.  
• Glass absorbs heat slowly, so the longer the time used by slower rates, the rounder the profile will be.

Since time is a significant factor in achieving a given profile, any soaks/holds in the schedule will affect the profile at a set temperature.  A schedule without a bubble squeeze will give a different result than one with a bubble squeeze at the same temperature.

To help achieve knowledge of the rate/time effect, make some further test tiles.  Use different rates and soaks for the test tiles of the same nature as the first temperature tests. But vary only one of those factors at a time. Consider the results of these tests when writing the schedule for more complex or thicker layups. 

Mass

Also be aware that more mass takes longer to achieve the same profile.  Slower rates and longer times will help to achieve the desired profile at a lower temperature.  It is probably not practical to make a whole series of test tiles for thicker items.  But, a sample or two of different thicknesses and mass will be helpful to give a guide to the amount of adjustment required to achieve the desired outcome.

The results of sample tiles are due to more than just temperature.  They are a combination of rate, time, and temperature (and sometimes mass).  These factors need to be considered when devising or evaluating a schedule, because without considering those factors, it is not possible to accurately evaluate the relevance of a suggested top temperature.

See also: Low Temperature Kilnforming, available from Bullseye and Etsy

Scheduling for Thick Landscapes

Thick slabs often involve numerous firings of increasingly thick work.  I am using an existing example, with their permission, of the first stages of a thick landscape.  The initial concern was with bubbles in the first layup, then the strategy for firing the thick slab.

Plans

This is the first part of a landscape with depth.  It will be fired 5-7 more times.  This first piece will be inverted for the next firing with the clear facing up, to avoid reactions between the colours.  It is similar to an open face casting. There is a Bullseye Tip Sheet on open face casting that will give a lot of information.

Layup

Picture credit: Osnat Menshes

This work has a base of clear that is mostly overlaid with one layer of 3mm pieces, although in some places another layer, and there are some pre-fired elements as well.  It is fired on Thinfire shelf paper.

Bubbles 

There is concern about the number and size of the bubbles after the firing, and how to avoid them.  Will they grow over the multiple firings?

The many small bubbles are characteristic of kilnformed glass.  The few larger bubbles may result from the frit that is under the pieces that form the top surface.  And there are some overlaps of clear over colour that may form pockets where air can collect. I advise leaving the scattering of the frit until all the decorative pieces are in place.  The bubbles will migrate toward the top during the multiple firings.  They will not grow in size unless they combine during the upward migration.  A later suggestion about reducing the number of firings will reduce the bubble migration and risk of increasing in size.

Picture credit: Osnat Menshes

Schedule

Proposed Schedule (Temperatures in degrees Celsius)

1: 180 – 560, 30’    I would go to 610 for 30'

2: 25 – 680, 120’    I would use only 30'

3: 220 – 810, 15’    I would set the top temperature at 816, 15’.

4: 9999 – 593, 30’  Eliminate this segment. 

5: 9999 – 482, 120’ I suggest one hour soak

8: 55 – 370, off      83 – 427, 0’

7: 150 – 371, 0’

8: 330 – to room temperature, off.

 

Eliminate segment number 4.  Any temperature equalisation done at this temperature, is undone by the AFAP to the  annealing.  The temperature equalisation occurs at the annealing temperature. No soak at an intermediate temperature is required.  This blog post gives some information about annealing above and below the annealing point (Tg). 

Firing Incremental Layers

The plan is for five to seven more firings.  Continuing to build up the thickness on each firing, may have some problems.

• There is increased risk of compatibility problems when firing a piece to full fuse many times.
• There is a risk of more bubbles and of the existing ones becoming larger as they move upwards and combine with other smaller ones.
• With each firing the thickness is increasing and so becoming a longer firing.  This is because the heat up, annealing, and cooling each need to be longer.  For example - 6mm needs 3hour cooling, 12mm needs 5 hours, 19mm needs 9 hours. 

Multiple Slabs

These are the main reasons that I recommend firing a series of 6mm slabs separately and combining them in one final firing.  Firing a series of 6mm slabs and then combining them in a single long and slow final firing has advantages.

• The individual pieces do not need to go through so many full fuse firings, reducing the risk of compatibility problems.
• The small bubbles in each firing will not have the chance to rise through all the layers to become larger.
• The total time in the kiln for the combined pieces will be less than adding layers to already fired layers.

Examples

It is often difficult to convince people that firing by adding incrementally to an existing slab, longer firing times are required than by firing a group of 6mm slabs and a single combined firing of all the slabs.  I give an example to illustrate the differences.

Annealing

Assume there are to be a total of eight firings (existing 6mm slab and 3mm for each of seven more firings).  Also assume that each additional firing is of 3mm. This makes a total of 28mm.  Compare annealing and cooling times for each firing:

Firing      thickness       anneal and cool (hours minimum)

1            6mm                    3

2            9mm                    4

3            12mm                   5

4            15mm                   7

5            18mm                   9

6            21mm                   11.5

7            25mm                   14

8            28mm                   17

Total                                   70.5 hours annealing time (minimum)

To fire up 5 six millimetre slabs takes less time – 3 hours annealing and cooling time for each firing cumulates to 15 hours.  Add to that the final firing of 17 hours annealing time.  A total of 32 hours.  This is half the time of adding to the existing slab at each firing.  Multiple 6mm slabs can be fired at the one time if there is space in the kiln, which would reduce the kiln time for the 6mm slabs even further. 

An additional advantage of firing 6mm slabs and combining them, is that bubbles can be squeezed out more easily in the final thick slab fring because of the combined weight of the  slabs.  You could make the individual slabs a little thicker, but that would involve damming each slab.  Not an impossible task of course.  And it would change the calculations, by reducing the number of firings.

Heat Up

Another time saving is to use the second cooling rate from the Bullseye document Annealing Thick Slabs as the first up ramp rate. Take this rate up to a minimum of 540˚C. Although, this is an arbitrary temperature above the strain point to ensure all the glass is above the brittle phase.  It is possible to maintain this initial rate to the bubble squeeze.  But with the slow rises in temperature required for thicker slabs, it is sensible to increase the rate from 540 to bubble squeeze to reduce the firing time.  Once past the bubble squeeze a more rapid rate can be used to the top temperature.  

The heat up times could be about half the minimum cooling times.

A worked example (with certain assumptions) would be:

Firing      thickness       time to top temperature total time.

1            6mm             6.3               

2            9mm             7.1

3            12mm            8.4

4            15mm            10.7

5            18mm            15.9

6            21mm            19.4

7            25mm            25.1

8            28mm            29.1              ca.122 hours

But firing five times for 6mm equals 31.5 hours plus the final firing up of 29.1 hours equals a total of 60.6 hours.  Again about one half the time of progressively building up a base slab to the final thickness.

Savings

This example shows that approximately 90 hours of firing time can be saved by making a series of six millimetre slabs and combining them in a final firing.  There is the additional advantage of reducing the occurrence of bubbles between the layers in the final firing because of the weight of the combined slabs.

Mould Elevation

 

The expansion characteristics of glass and ceramics components

Many people advocate the elevation of moulds.  Mainly for air flow to equalise temperatures above and below the mould.  But also, to prolong the life of the mould.  My observation on these reasons for elevating the mould are that they are not harmful, but not necessary, except for investment moulds.

My experiments have showed insignificant differences in temperatures above and below whether elevated or not.  Since the air temperature under the mould is much the same whether elevated or not, it indicates that elevation of the mould has no significant effect.  But, of course, elevation of the mould does no harm either. 

More important than elevation of the mould, is consideration of the nature of the ceramic mould.  Ceramics have two expansion/contraction temperatures called inversions.  The first is at 226˚C/439˚F, and the second around 570˚C/1058˚F.  The ceramic expands rapidly at these temperatures.  There is a 2.5% increase in volume at 226˚C and a slightly more gradual 1% increase around 570˚C.

This a main reason to use slow ramp rates up to at least 570˚C/1058˚F.  Slower rates ease the ceramic expansion speed and reduces the risk of breaking.  So, slower rates will lengthen the life of ceramic moulds. The cool down for annealing and cooling is slow enough that it presents no risk for the ceramic.

There are occasions when the mould must be elevated, though.  These are when the mould is large, heavy, or damp.  This is to protect the shelf rather than the mould or glass.

 

Wire in glass

 

The cracks around the wire imbedded in the glass in the above image are not incompatibility cracks. They do not surround the square piece that traps the wire into the glass. These are from differential expansion/contraction stress between the wire and the glass. 

 

Picture credit: Charmaine Maw

This picture shows the stress that a single strand of wire will induce in glass (the bright light around the wire).  Wire is never going to have similar characteristics to the glass, so the glass must be strong enough to contain the resulting stress.  Anything that increases the mass of the wire, such as twisting or spirals, will increase the stress. 

 

Kanthal and nichrome wires are best as included wire hangers. They are designed for high temperature work and so do not weaken from the heat. This means that high temperature wire as thin as 0.5mm/22 gauge can hold a lot of weight.  Much greater weight than is used in most glass objects to be hung rather than fixed.

Keep the wire as a single strand and as thin as possible, consistent with sufficient strength.  Hammering wire flat can also help reduce the stress by thinning it.

Profile

A sharp tacked piece needs to be fired as though thicker. This example is a single layer base and a square of glass to trap the wire fired to a sharp tack.  It needs to be fired as though 2.5 times the thickest part - 15mm.  A rounded tack fuse of the same layup would need to be fired as for 12mm.

Layup

The use of wire in glass needs to consider how the air will escape from around the wire.  Yes, if the wire exits the glass, there is a channel for it to dissipate.  But air tends to collect along the length of the wire.  If the wire is fully enclosed in the glass, the layup must accommodate the need for air escape routes.  This might be with a fine layer of powder, design elements, chips of glass to hold the outer edges of the glass up for longer, or other devices.

 

Scheduling

The example shown at the start of this blog, is a sharp tack and needed the 2.5 times scheduling.  That probably would have avoided the crack in the single layer base.  That single layer cools faster than the wire with the added piece of glass.  A bubble squeeze is a good idea, even though it would not normally be considered.  This gives the best chance of reducing the bubbles that form around the inclusion.

 

You need to be careful about increasing the ramp rate until the glass has passed out of the brittle phase.  This is about 540˚C/1005˚F. The increase in the ramp rate during the brittle phase may cause cracks. It is, of course, more likely to occur during cooling because the metal will be contracting more than the glass during the brittle phase.  This contrast in contraction rates induces stress that may be great enough to crack or break the glass.

 

 

Uneven Slumps on Deep Rectangular Moulds

 "Can anyone please tell me why this mould always comes out wonky and devitrifies and pulls in on the edges. I used Primo Primer; my kiln is level, and this is the slump schedule I use for 3mm base with 6mm in places [temperatures in Celsius]: 100/593/30 mins; 66/663/25 mins; 204/482/60 mins; 66/371/10 mins; END.*   12cm square."

 GlassAlisa

The suggestion has been made that having a 6mm base would lessen the irregular slump in the mould.  I am not convinced that making the base thicker will sort the problems.

 

1)  This is a very deep mould in relation to the span.  The mould sides are steep.

 

2) The glass slides down and picks up marks from sliding down the walls of the mould.  The marks are not devitrification.

 

3) Deep slumps are prone to going off centre. One fix is to watch and be prepared to reach in with wet sticks to readjust the glass placement on the mould.  

 

4) Deep moulds (deep is relative to the span of the mould) require two or more stages of slumping. Start with shallow a slump, and progress through steeper ones.

5) The sides dog bone on many rectangular moulds.  One way to reduce this is to round the corners with a 10mm radius.

 

6) Reducing the forming temperature, and extending the soak time dramatically, will go some way to alleviating the previous problems. I suggest trying a 620C slump temperature and soak for 2 - 3 hours.  Peek at intervals to see when the slump is complete, then advance to anneal and cool.

In my view, it is a mould from a maker that does not fully understand glass behaviour.

And in passing, the ramp speed from top temperature to annealing should be as fast as possible, to avoid any risk of devitrification on the way down.  

* Schedule in Fahrenheit for the Americans.  

• 198 to 1100, 30' 
• 119 to 1225, 25'
• 367 to 900, 60'  [ASAP is the recommended rate.  As it is a tack fused piece, I would anneal as though 12mm/4 layers.  This would use a 2 hour soak, cool at 100 to 800, 180 to 700, off ]
• 120 to 700, 10'
• End

Slumping Breaks on “go-to” Schedules

 An "It has always worked for me before" schedule implies a single approach to slumping regardless of differing conditions.  Layup alterations, thickness variations, colour contrasts, mould variations all affect the scheduling.  The schedule for each piece needs to be altered when there are changes from the schedule for the “standard” piece, or mould.

Photo credit: Emma Lee

In the example shown, we are not told the schedule, but it shows that the rate was a little too fast. If it had been faster the glass would have separated further apart. The heat was enough to appear to recombine at the edges where it was not slumping so much. 

Review your "go to" schedules whenever something changes. It may still be a good base from which to work. But you need to assess the layup, thickness, and any other variations to help adjust the schedule to fire each piece.

Some of the variations from the “standard” to be considered are:

Single layer slumping 

Weight

Mould sizes

Relative Slumping Depth

Mould shape and detail

Home Made Billets

You can make your own billets from small pot melts.  But why should anyone go to the effort? Some reasons are:

• ·        You can make your own colour. 
• ·        You can use your cullet/scrap (avoiding buying or making frit).
• ·        You don’t have to buy and break billet to size 
• ·        You can reduce the clouding caused by many microscopic bubbles surrounding the frit pieces. 
• ·        You can make a size to fit your casting mould. 
• ·        Potentially, you will reduce needling.

 Now you are convinced of the advantages, you want to know how.

Preparation

• ·        Select the glass. Avoid iridised glass and any ground edges – they will cause haze in the final casting. Wash all the glass. Place the glass in a small flowerpot.
• ·        Weigh out the amount of glass cullet needed for the mould and add about 50gms to account for the glass that will stick to the pot.  Calculating the required weight is relatively simple and this post gives the information.

Dams

• ·        Arrange dams in such a way that the resulting billet will fit into the mould without overhang.  It might be quite a tall billet. In which case cast it horizontal with the height as the length of the billet.
• ·        Line the dams with Thinfire/Papyros at least. One mm fibre paper would be better. 
• ·        The dams can be on a kiln washed shelf or on fibre paper. The bottom of the glass will be fine either way.
• ·        Place the pot above the dams.  The higher, the fewer bubbles in the billet.  And any left in the billet will be reduced by flow in the casting firing.
• ·        Multiple billets can be made of different colours, sizes, etc., at the same time.

Firing

• ·        Fire to around 900ºC/1650ºF and soak for hours.  Observation will show when the pot is empty.  Clue: There will be no string of glass from the bottom of the pot.
• ·        Anneal as for the smallest dimension.  If you are doing multiple sizes, the dimension must be taken from the biggest piece.
• ·        When cool, remove and clean the separator off the pieces thoroughly.  A 15 minute soak in a 5% citric acid solution will speed the process.

Casting

• ·        Place billet in casting mould. The first ramp rate needs to be for the smallest dimension of the billet.  This may be a slower rate than when using frit for casting.
• ·        Do a long bubble squeeze in the 650ºC to 670ºC range – up to two hours, but a minimum of one.
• ·        Fire to your normal top temperature and time.
• ·        Anneal for the largest piece.

 

More information here 

Slumping Strategy

A schedule was presented for a slumping problem of a 6mm/0.25” blank.  It consisted of three segments each of a rate of 277C/500F with short holds up to 399C/750F and then a rapid rise to 745C/1375F.  The cool was done with two long holds at 537C/1000F and 482C/900F followed by cooling rates for 12mm/0.5”

My response was that, yes it was fired too high.  Not only that, but the firing strategy, as shown by the schedule, is odd. 

Strategy

The general strategy for slumping follows these ideas.

·        Glass is slow to absorb heat, and in one sense, this schedule accepts that by having short soaks at intervals.  As glass is slow to absorb heat, it is necessary to use slow ramp rates and without pauses and changes in rates.  This should be applied all the way to the slumping temperature.

·        Holds of short durations are not effective at any stage in a slumping firing.  The objective is to allow the glass time to form to the mould with as little marking as possible.  This implies slow rates to low temperatures with significant holds at appropriate stages.  This about putting enough heat work into the glass that higher temperatures are not needed.

·        This kind of firing requires observation for new moulds and new arrangements of glass to ensure the slump is complete.  Once you know the mould requirements and are repeating the layup of the glass, the firing records will tell you what rates and times to use to get a complete slump with minimum marking.

·        The hold at annealing temperature is to equalise the temperature throughout the glass to produce a stress-free result.  Any soaks above are negated or repeated by the necessary soak at the annealing temperature.  The hold there must be long enough to complete the temperature equalisation that is the annealing.

·        My work has shown that annealing for one (3mm/0.125”) layer thicker produces a piece with less stress.  This indicates that a 6mm/0.25” piece should be annealed as for 9mm/0.35” to get the best result.

The summary of the firing strategy for slumping is:

• ·        A single ramp of a slow rate to the slumping temperature.
• ·        Observation of the progress of the slump to determine the lowest practical temperature and hold time.
• ·        Annealing for one layer thicker that being slumped.
• ·        Three stage cooling of the piece at rates related to the annealing hold.

Critique

This is a critique of the schedule. For comparison, my schedule for a full fused 6mm blank would be different.

• ·        140ºC/250ºF to 677º/1250ºF for 30 to 45 minutes.
• ·        9999 to 482ºC/900ºF for 1.5 hours
• ·        69ºC/124ºF to 427ºC/800ºF, no hold
• ·        125ºC/225ºF to 371ºC/700ºF, no hold
• ·        330ºC/600ºF to room temperature, off.

The rate of the published schedule is fast for a full fused blank and extremely fast for a tack fused blank. This needs to be slowed.  The schedule provides a single (fast) rate of heating, but with unnecessary holds.  The holds are so short as to be ineffective, anyway. There is no need for the holds on the way up to the slumping temperature.  In general slumping schedules are of fewer segments.   This is because glass behaves well with steady slow inputs of heat.

Then strangely, the schedule increases the rate to top temperature.  It does so with a brief soak at 593ºC/1100ºF.  This fast rate of 333ºC/ 600ºF begins at 400ºC/750ºF.  This is still in the brittle phase of the glass and risks breaking the glass.  The brittle stage ends around 540ºC/ 1005ºF.

This rapid rate softens the surface and edges of the glass without allowing time for the underside to catch up.  This explains uneven edges.  It also risks breaking the glass from too great expansion of the top before the bottom.

Additionally, the schedule uses a temperature more than 55ºC/100ºF above what is a reasonable highest slumping temperature.  The top temperature of this schedule is in the tack fusing range.

There is no need for a hold 55ºC/100ºF above annealing soak. It is the annealing soak that equalises the temperature before the cool begins.  The higher temperature equalisation is negated by the cooler soak at annealing temperature. So, the hold at the higher temperature and slow cool to the annealing temperature only delays the firing by about two hours.  It does not have any effect on the final piece.

The schedule is cooling for a piece of 12mm/0.5”.  This is slower than necessary.  As noted above, cooling for one layer thicker than the piece is advisable to get the most stress free result.  The annealing soak could be 1.5 hours following this idea.  Cooling with a three stage schedule reduces the risk of inducing temporary stresses that might break the glass.  Although the initial cooling rate I recommend is very similar to this schedule, it safely reduces the total cooling time.

• ·        69ºC/124ºF to 427ºC/800ºF, no hold
• ·        125ºC/225ºF to 371ºC/700ºF, no hold
• ·        330ºC/600ºF to room temperature, off.

Using my kind of schedule for the first time will require peeking once top temperature is reached to determine when the slump is complete. It may take as much as an hour. Be prepared to either extend the hold, or to skip to the next segment if complete earlier. The controller manual will explain how.

 More information is given in Low Temperature Kilnforming, An Evidence-based guide to scheduling.  Available from Etsy and Bullseye

Refiring and Annealing

A question about re-fusing: 

I have just taken a large piece, with uneven layers out of the kiln, it went in … and fired for double thickness. A small piece has flipped and is showing the white side. … If I cover this with a thin layer of coloured powder frit, does the piece need the long anneal process when I fire it again, please. I will be taking it up to the lowest tack fuse temperature possible [my emphasis], so the rest doesn’t change too much.

When considering the re-firing of a fused piece, even with minimal changes, the schedule needs re-evaluation of both ramp rates and annealing. In this case, the major change is using a sinter firing – “the lowest tack fuse temperature possible”.

Ramp Up Rates

Previously the piece was in several layers.

• The piece is now a thicker single piece and needs more careful ramp rates.
• It is also of uneven thicknesses.
• And you intend to fire to a sharp tack or sinter.

These things make a requirement for more cautious firing. You cannot fire as quickly from cold as forthe original unfired piece. Previously, the sheets could be heated as though separate. They were not hot enough to stick together until beyond the strain point. They now could experience the differential expansion from  rapid heating, which can cause breaks. 

The previously fired piece will need a slower initial ramp rate this time. This is because you are firing for a sharp tack. This is also known as fusing to stick, or sintering. It is not because of a second firing. It is because of the differences in the glass for this firing. You are firing a single thicker piece of uneven layers to a sharp tack.

Looking at Stone* and the Bullseye chart for Annealing Thick Slabs indicates that in general, the first ramp rate should be halved for each doubling of calculated thickness. This is for full fused items. However, this is going to be a more difficult fusing profile - sintering. The calculation for sintering is as for 2.5 times the thickest part of the piece. This factor of 2.5 was determined by a series of experiments that are detailed in the eBook Low Temperature Kilnforming.

You started with firing two layers of 3mm/0.125” at possibly 330°C/595°F. You are now firing the fused 6mm/0.252 piece to a sharp tack. This means you should be looking at firing for 2.5 times or 15mm/0.625”. This implies 240°C/435°F as the maximum first ramp rate. A more cautious approach is to fire to 300ºC/540ºF at a rate of 72ºC/130ºF, as most heat-up breaks occur below that temperature. You should maintain that rate to 540°C/1005°F afterwards. 

Annealing

The annealing time and cool rate will be affected in the same way as the change to a sharp tack firing. Without that fuse profile change, and no change in the profile or thickness of the piece, it could have been annealed as previously. However, changing to a sharp tack means a longer anneal soak is required. This sharp tack annealing is for 2.5 times the thickness or 150 minutes.

Cooling

The cooling rates for this piece are not the same as for the first firing. A sharp tack firing will require cooling rates of:

• 40ºC/73ºF to 482°C/900°F.
• 72ºC/130ºF f427ºC/800ºF.
• 240ºC/435ºF to room temperature

This applies regardless of the fusing glass you are using, as it is the viscosity which is the important factor in cooling.  Viscosity is primarily related to temperature.

Refiring with Significant Additions.

Ramp rate

If there are additions to the thickness, a slower first ramp rate will necessary. If an additional 3mm layer is placed on top of a 6mm base for a rounded tack, you will need to schedule as for 19mm/0.75” (twice the thickest part). This will be 150°C/270°F for the first ramp rate. For a sharp tack, it will be as for 22.5mm/0.825”. The maximum rate will be reduced to 120ºC/216F for the first ramp. This shows the additional caution required for sharper fusing profiles.

Annealing

The annealing will need to be longer than the first firing. The thickness has changed with the additions of pieces for a rounded tack firing. Instead of annealing for 6mm/0.25” you will be annealing as for 19mm/0.75”. This requires a hold of three hours at the annealing temperature and cooling over three stages:

• The first cool rate is 25°C/45°F per hour to 482°C/900°F.
• The second rate is 45°C/81°F per hour to 427ºC/800ºF.
• The last rate is at 90C°C/162°F per hour to room temperature.

If there are additions, plus firing to the lowest possible tack temperature – as in the example - the firing must be as for 2.5 times the actual thickness. Annealing as for 25mm/1” gives rates of:

• The first cool rate is 15°C/27°F per hour to 482°C/900°F.
• The second rate is 27°C/49°F per hour to 427ºC/800ºF.
• The last rate is at 90C°C/162°F per hour to room temperature.

These examples show how dramatically later additions in thickness can add to the length of the firing to re-fire a well-annealed piece without breaking it on the heat-up. It also shows that changing the profile to a sharper tack affects the annealing and cooling times and rates.

 

*Graham Stone. Firing Schedules for Glass; the Kiln Companion. 2000, Melbourne. ISBN 0-646-397733-8

As a side note Stone’s book has become a collectable.