Avoiding Slumping Breaks

Most slumping breaks are due to scheduling.  The piece to be slumped has survived the fuse, and with good practice will have been tested for stress. It has passed all the compatibility and annealing complications, so it is sound. 

There are things you should think about when determining the schedule for slumping. General considerations are thickness, and degree of fuse. There are many other factors to be considered – such as depth, mould detail, span, colour contrasts, etc. These will affect the scheduling in detail rather than the general approach.

Ramp Rates

In general, the scheduling for the first ramp rate is done by taking note of profile (degree of fuse), and so, its effective thickness.

Each profile of fused glass has its own considerations.  Full fused pieces can be fired at the rate recommended by the many schedules for slumping fused items. Tack fused and other glass configurations need further precautions.

The ramp rate for slumping should be no faster than a rate to ensure the glass is evenly heated throughout the rise to the slumping temperature. I recommend that this rate of advance should be a steady single rate all the way to the slumping temperature.  There is no need for soaking at any point during this temperature rise. 

But as much of the breaking of glass occurs below 300°C (573°F), a precaution can be added. An additional slower first ramp can be inserted with a 20-minute soak at 260°C/500°F before proceeding. This also helps protect ceramic moulds which have a cristobalite inversion at that temperature. 

The rates for moulds that are large relative to kiln size, that are heavy, or may be damp, should be considerably slower than for other glass. 

Force of Breaks

If the glass has broken during the forming process, take note of the distance between the pieces.  The amount of space between the broken pieces shows the relative force that caused the break.  Greater space is related to more stress; lesser space or only partial cracks indicate lower levels of stress.  The separation distance indicates the degree of change required in scheduling. A small parting of the glass requires only a little reduction in the rate.  Large spaces indicate that much slower rates are required, and possibly a complete rethink of the schedule.

This approach can be used for breaks on the heat up or the cool down.  Whether the glass is rounded or sharp, the force of the break will still be an indicator of the degree of change required.  On a rounded edge break, it is the heating rate that needs to be slowed.  Sharp-edged breaks indicate that the anneal soak needs to be lengthened and the anneal cool slowed.  The rounded versus sharp edges are more difficult to establish at these low temperatures and need to be combined with how well the formed pieces match.  Of course, there will be some experimentation required to determine the exact amount of change needed. 

“It hasn’t happened before” Scenario.

Often people experience breaks even though the set up was similar and the schedule was the same for successful pieces in the past.  There are two responses to this – “what did you change for the setup and firing of this piece from others?”, and “You have been skating on the edge of disaster for a while”.  Glass behaviour is predictable. Since the break occurred when the setup was similar, and the schedule was the same, something else has changed.

Consider what was different.  Review the differences in set up of the piece – colours, arrangement, thickness, volume of material used – everything that might be different at each stage of the layup.  Note these differences and review them one by one. 

• ·   Could have any one element been sufficient to make the firing conditions different? 
• ·   Could a combination of these differences have been significant? 
• ·   Are there any differences in the firing schedule? 
• ·   Have you made any little tweaks in the schedule? 
• ·   What is different? Different times of the day, different power supply, plugs in or out, venting, peeking, different shelves (or none) – any small thing that could have introduced a variable in the firing conditions. 

For each of these differences consider what needs to be altered, if anything, for a successful firing.  Combine these small tweaks into a full schedule and run it as an experiment.